<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google now censoring anti-Obama searches?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2008/11/29/google-now-censoring-anti-obama-searches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2008/11/29/google-now-censoring-anti-obama-searches/</link>
	<description>Exposing the Andrea Mitchell bias and Media bias in America! - Officially declared UN-America per Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:19:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin: Inside the world of Google censors &#124; Market Addicts</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2008/11/29/google-now-censoring-anti-obama-searches/comment-page-1/#comment-5064</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin: Inside the world of Google censors &#124; Market Addicts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=261#comment-5064</guid>
		<description>[...] Google now censoring anti-Obama searches? &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google now censoring anti-Obama searches? | Fire Andrea Mitchell! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtngoat61</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2008/11/29/google-now-censoring-anti-obama-searches/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>mtngoat61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=261#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Yes.  Google is definitely suppressing current news for key words associated with Obama to protect and cover up for him, imo. You can only find the current news if you know exactly what to look for. Try these:

&quot;obama citizenship&quot;  then try &quot;obama citizenship donofrio&quot;

You get old garbage news, and/or the pro-Obama sites like FactCheck.org and Snopes.com on the first, and current news on the second. Look at the dates on what is reported on the first search result vs. the 2nd.

and then try

&quot;obama supreme court&quot; then try &quot;obama supreme court donofrio&quot;

You get old garbage news, and/or the pro-Obama sites like FactCheck.org and Snopes.com on the first, and current news on the second. Look at the dates on what is reported on the first search result vs. the 2nd.

And based on key words in the results, articles found in the second should also be found in the first. This is deliberate sand boxing of new news about Obama and the key words of interest.

These are only a couple of many examples out there.

This is called &quot;sand boxing&quot; in the search engine business. And they are using sand boxing to promote a political agenda, that is to hide from the people detrimental news about Obama. Google&#039;s CEO is an ardent Obama supporter and campaign contributor.  But this is going too far and is suppressing free speech and the sharing of it easily on the internet.  Google should be sued via a class action suit on this, imo. They have deep pockets. And discovery would be very interesting, including deposing the CEO about this. JMHO.

Mountain Publius Goat
http://www.obamacitizenshipfacts.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Google is definitely suppressing current news for key words associated with Obama to protect and cover up for him, imo. You can only find the current news if you know exactly what to look for. Try these:</p>
<p>&#8220;obama citizenship&#8221;  then try &#8220;obama citizenship donofrio&#8221;</p>
<p>You get old garbage news, and/or the pro-Obama sites like FactCheck.org and Snopes.com on the first, and current news on the second. Look at the dates on what is reported on the first search result vs. the 2nd.</p>
<p>and then try</p>
<p>&#8220;obama supreme court&#8221; then try &#8220;obama supreme court donofrio&#8221;</p>
<p>You get old garbage news, and/or the pro-Obama sites like FactCheck.org and Snopes.com on the first, and current news on the second. Look at the dates on what is reported on the first search result vs. the 2nd.</p>
<p>And based on key words in the results, articles found in the second should also be found in the first. This is deliberate sand boxing of new news about Obama and the key words of interest.</p>
<p>These are only a couple of many examples out there.</p>
<p>This is called &#8220;sand boxing&#8221; in the search engine business. And they are using sand boxing to promote a political agenda, that is to hide from the people detrimental news about Obama. Google&#8217;s CEO is an ardent Obama supporter and campaign contributor.  But this is going too far and is suppressing free speech and the sharing of it easily on the internet.  Google should be sued via a class action suit on this, imo. They have deep pockets. And discovery would be very interesting, including deposing the CEO about this. JMHO.</p>
<p>Mountain Publius Goat<br />
<a href="http://www.obamacitizenshipfacts.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamacitizenshipfacts.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
