<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guess the biggest earmark in the omni-porkulus bill. $2 billion FutureGen Alliance Project of Illinois &#8211; heavily supported by Dick Durbin AND Blago!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2009/03/11/guess-the-biggest-earmark-in-the-omni-porkulus-bill-2-billion-futuregen-alliance-project-of-illinois-heavily-supported-by-dick-durbin-and-blago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2009/03/11/guess-the-biggest-earmark-in-the-omni-porkulus-bill-2-billion-futuregen-alliance-project-of-illinois-heavily-supported-by-dick-durbin-and-blago/</link>
	<description>Exposing the Andrea Mitchell bias and Media bias in America! - This site is NOT politically correct! Terrorists are actually called terrorists!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomtom</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2009/03/11/guess-the-biggest-earmark-in-the-omni-porkulus-bill-2-billion-futuregen-alliance-project-of-illinois-heavily-supported-by-dick-durbin-and-blago/comment-page-1/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>tomtom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=2688#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>lots of rhetoric from both sides of the aisle. Anyone know the actual,factual dollar amount of the earmarks? Pretend it is 20.5 Billion. Expressed as a percentage of the total spending (410 Billion)that&#039;s five(5) percent of the total spending bill, yet both Repubs and Dems are crying(along with the media) that this is &quot;loaded&quot; with Pork,&quot;laden&quot; with Pork, &quot;Porkulus&quot;,etc.,etc., ad nauseum. As Mark Twain once said, &quot;start with the facts, then distort them as you please.&quot;
There must be a non-partisan website that enumerates the potential Pork, however, remember one mans pork is another mans necessity.

P.S.___only liberals are whiners???Isn&#039;t that  similar to saying that only conservatives are patriotic because they support the War in Iraq.
At this time in our national debate, it seems that the chance of civil discourse and non-partisan solutions have about as much chance as the installation of a water cooler in Hades. (Gosh, better check the Omnibus Bill for that earmark!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lots of rhetoric from both sides of the aisle. Anyone know the actual,factual dollar amount of the earmarks? Pretend it is 20.5 Billion. Expressed as a percentage of the total spending (410 Billion)that&#8217;s five(5) percent of the total spending bill, yet both Repubs and Dems are crying(along with the media) that this is &#8220;loaded&#8221; with Pork,&#8221;laden&#8221; with Pork, &#8220;Porkulus&#8221;,etc.,etc., ad nauseum. As Mark Twain once said, &#8220;start with the facts, then distort them as you please.&#8221;<br />
There must be a non-partisan website that enumerates the potential Pork, however, remember one mans pork is another mans necessity.</p>
<p>P.S.___only liberals are whiners???Isn&#8217;t that  similar to saying that only conservatives are patriotic because they support the War in Iraq.<br />
At this time in our national debate, it seems that the chance of civil discourse and non-partisan solutions have about as much chance as the installation of a water cooler in Hades. (Gosh, better check the Omnibus Bill for that earmark!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 211/212 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.fireandreamitchell.com @ 2012-02-10 01:45:37 -->
