Shepard Smith – on enhanced interrogation “I don’t give a rat’s ass if it helps!”

Spoken like a true liberal! From yesterday’s “Strategy Room,” in a reaction to Blair’s admission that enhanced interrogation works, Shepard Smith, FoxNews flaming liberal who watchers of the network have to endure at noon and 4pm EST had this to say in regards to the success enhanced interrogation:

“I don’t give a rat’s ass if it helps!”


Heres the video: Content warning about the video: Smith also drops the F bomb.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Comments

  • democratsarefascists

    Shep lost it way back there.
    I’m amazed he didn’t get jail time for deliberately assaulting that woman with his car.
    Maybe he should go easy on the makeup and use the cash for therapy?

  • LJPETERSON

    How can we get this creep off the air? He is so dumb he has to use profanity because he can’t keep up with the debate. He poUnds the table and has a tizzy fit. Fox needs to can him, he obviously wants to go to MSNBC.

  • Captainof4

    The only thing that I get from Mr. Smith is the satisfaction of him being easy on the eyes. I certainly do not use his news views, but to get rid of him will only hurt Fox News image. Having him on helps to keep it “fair and balanced”…just do as I do…DO NOT watch him. Well…maybe he is not as easy on the eyes as he once was. His views and use of ugly words makes him very unappealing. If I want to hear liberal nonsense I would watch CNN, MSNBC or I would listen to my college teachers underhanded remarks.

  • B. O’Malley

    I am grateful that Shepard Smith rejected the issue of whether or not “enhanced interrogations” worked.

    Torture is wrong. The claim that someone may have benefited or lived longer because someone else committed the crime does not make torture less of a crime.

    Experienced interrogators, like retired FBI agent Dan Coleman and retired Army Colonel Stuart Herrington, doubt that disrespectful interrogations get good information. Experienced interrogators believe that respectful interrogations are the most effective method of getting information, and the American way to act to people at our mercy.

    The fact that respectful interrogations “work,” however, is not their only justification. More importantly, respectful treatment of people at our mercy is the morally sound choice. The fact that prisoner abuse endangers American lives overseas is secondary to the first concern: It is not the thing to do.

    For Dan Coleman, see http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/02/schuster.column/index.html

    For Stuart Herrington’s opinion piece in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, consult http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07294/826876-35.stm