Judicial Watch Uncovers New FCC Documents on Fairness Doctrine Debate

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) concerning the “Fairness Doctrine,” a policy abolished in 1987, and other governmental means to limit free speech in the media. Judicial Watch obtained the documents in response to a December 2008 Freedom of Information Act request. More from JW:

While President Obama is on record opposing the return of the Fairness Doctrine, which is viewed by many as an attempt to squelch the free speech of conservatives in the media, these documents show that the FCC is considering alternative proposals that may also regulate free speech in the media under the professed goal of “diversity.”

For example, in December 2007, the FCC proposed new “localism” measures to force broadcast stations to offer programming more “responsive to the needs and interests of the communities that they are licensed to serve.” These proposed measures, highlighted in a document entitled, “The Report on Broadcast Localism and Notice of Approved Rulemaking,” included a requirement that broadcasters, “provide 3 hours per week of locally-produced program,” and that licensees establish “permanent advisory boards (including representatives of underserved community segments).” The FCC noted that these measures would become part of the application renewal process to make sure broadcasters “meet their responsibilities.”

Problems with “localism” are highlighted in a legal memo written by Kathleen Kirby of the law firm Wiley Rein and submitted to Rosemary Harold, serving as legal counsel to FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell. In the document, which was distributed internally at the FCC, Ms. Kirby advises that the Fairness Doctrine “would do well to stay dead.” Ms. Kirby then turns her attention to “localism,” advising that such a policy could represent a “stealth enactment” of the Fairness Doctrine. Ms. Kirby states: “Convene permanent advisory boards? Give aggrieved listeners ‘more straightforward guidance’ on ‘how individuals can directly participate in the license renewal process?’ That sounds mild. But then again, so did the Fairness Doctrine.”

“These documents are a useful insight into the internal debates at the FCC about the Fairness Doctrine and its cousin, ‘localism,’ said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “We’re going to have to keep an eye on this FCC. The last thing our country needs is bureaucrats in the Obama administration stomping on the First Amendment rights of conservatives.”

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Sen. Jim DeMint to force whiny Democrats hand on Fairness Doctorine Sen. Jim DeMint announced that he will force a vote...
Camille Paglia (democrat) actually speaks the truth about the censorship, err Fairness Doctrine Ever been to one of those Brazilian restaurants where they...
B. Hussein Obama administration no longer denying interest on pursing the censorship, err Fairness Doctrine With as far left as Hussein Obama has taken this...
Judicial Watch Files Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit against HUD to Obtain ACORN Documents Judicial Watch is seeking records related to the HUD’s (Department...
Obama Propaganda Effort Exposed – Judicial Watch Obtains New CIA Documents on Terrorist Interrogations Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit on...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

May 8, 2009 · Filed Under Fairness Doctorine, General Politics, censorship

Comments

One Response to “Judicial Watch Uncovers New FCC Documents on Fairness Doctrine Debate”

Obama’s “Cone of Silence” for Conservative Radio & Internet: Media Diversity Not for Diversity of Ideas, but for Diversity of Skin Color « Frugal Café Blog Zone on May 28th, 2009 9:12 am

[...] the ‘Fairness’ Doctrine Conga Line: NY Dem Rep Maurice Hinchey Fire Andrea Mitchell!: Judicial Watch Uncovers New FCC Documents on Fairness Doctrine Debate Brian Jennings, Big Hollywood: The Fight for Free Speech is On! Richard Dawkins.net: Holland: SWAT [...]

Lets hear your point of view! - A warning to the liberal whiners who seem intent to flood our comment section with profanity. Save your keystrokes. The anti spamming script will just automatically delete your comment. Feel free to disagree with the host on any article posted here, but flame baits, racism, and profanity laced tirades will NOT be tolerated, and will eventually get your IP address banned!