DNA Doesn’t Determine WHERE a Person Is Born

Obama’s idiot Press Secretary Robert Gibbs says, “If I had some DNA, it wouldn’t assuage those who believe he wasn’t born here.”

Someone ought to tell him that DNA doesn’t have anything to do with where a person is born. Rather, it has everything to do with inherited genetic traits.

Obama is a dangerous fraud who is destroying our country. I wonder what it would take to make the message about his birth certificate so loud that it could no longer be denied/ignored?


No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

July 27, 2009 · Filed Under General Politics

Share/Bookmark

Comments

One Response to “DNA Doesn’t Determine WHERE a Person Is Born”

  1. CLARA FICATION on July 28th, 2009 1:27 am

    DNA won’t show where a person is born, but it WILL SHOW from whom that person was born!, i.e., it will define a person’s parents. There are lots of rumors, articles, and videos online about the possible “lineage” of Mr. O. A little DNA would definitely help to clarify things there.

    A good sleuth with a lively imagination could devise a lot of reasons why the original b.c. might be “embarrassing” and/or pose some legal snares… Maybe people need to use their imagination after learning as many FACTS as they can, and then just follow their nose… to come up with a plausible scenario…

Lets hear your point of view! - A warning to the liberal whiners who seem intent to flood our comment section with profanity. Save your keystrokes. The anti spamming script will just automatically delete your comment. Feel free to disagree with the host on any article posted here, but flame baits, racism, and profanity laced tirades will NOT be tolerated, and will eventually get your IP address banned!