Obama leaning toward half-assed plan of sending 34,000 more troops for Afghanistan

After months and months of dithering while Obama was busy playing golf, hosting dance parties at the White House and popping off the Copenhagen to beg for the Chicago 2016 Olympic, only to fall flat on his face, He may finally be ready to make a decision on sending more troops to Afghanistan. Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s “low risk option” and the one that would offer the best chance to contain the Taliban-led insurgency and stabilize Afghanistan called for 80,000 more troops. Instead, Obama is considering sending just 34,000, and going half-assed. It splits the difference between two other McChrystal options: a “high-risk” one that called for 20,000 additional troops and a “medium-risk” one that would add 40,000 to 45,000 troops, according to Mcclatchy.

The officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss internal administration planning, cautioned that Obama’s decision isn’t final, and won’t be until after administration officials discuss it with the NATO allies at a Nov. 23 meeting of the alliance’s North Atlantic Council and its Military Committee.

Coalition forces now include 67,000 U.S. and 42,000 troops from other countries. The Army’s counterinsurgency manual estimates that an all-out counterinsurgency campaign in a country with Afghanistan’s population would require about 600,000 troops.

Although the administration privately is holding out little hope of persuading Canada or the Netherlands to abandon their plans to withdraw combat troops, much less getting additional allied troops, it wants to avoid creating the impression — at home and abroad — that the U.S. “is going it alone” in Afghanistan, said one military official.

In an interview last week with The New York Times, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner complained that the American administration is leaving its NATO allies in the dark about its new strategy.

“What is the goal? What is the road? And in the name of what?” Kouchner asked, according to the Times. “Where are the Americans? It begins to be a problem . . . . We need to talk to each other as allies.”

The officials said that Obama also wants to complete his Nov. 11-19 Asia trip and a state visit by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of India, the arch foe of Pakistan, a key U.S. ally in the war on terror, before he announces his Afghanistan plan.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Obama likely to announce afghanistan decision by mid November according to ABC I sure hope Obama gets his golf swings in before...
Obama will NOT accept any of the Afghanistan war options presented by his national security team The judgment to lead right? Obama’s “good war” apparently isn’t...
McChrystal “satisfied” with Obama’s half-assed plan of adding 34,000 troops to Afghanistan Earlier in the week the AP reported that Obama was...
Obama to announce his Afghanistan plan from West Point – not the oval office The narcissist in chief will even use this December 1st...
Obama to send “only” 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan. Not 80,000 or even 40,000 as McChrystal requested According to Fox News, tonight’s “announcement” and photo op at...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

November 8, 2009 · Filed Under Afghanistan

Comments

Lets hear your point of view! - A warning to the liberal whiners who seem intent to flood our comment section with profanity. Save your keystrokes. The anti spamming script will just automatically delete your comment. Feel free to disagree with the host on any article posted here, but flame baits, racism, and profanity laced tirades will NOT be tolerated, and will eventually get your IP address banned!