Obama will NOT accept any of the Afghanistan war options presented by his national security team

The judgment to lead right? Obama’s “good war” apparently isn’t worth the time, much like the details about the Fort Hood tragedy last week when he decided to give his “shout outs” and jabber for 2 minutes before even acknowledging it. According to the AP, Obama does not plan to accept any of the Afghanistan war options presented by his national security team, instead pushing for revisions to clarify how and when U.S. troops would turn over responsibility to the Afghan government, a senior administration official said Wednesday.

That stance comes in the midst of forceful reservations about a possible troop buildup from the U.S. ambassador in Afghanistan, Karl Eikenberry, according to a second top administration official.

In strongly worded classified cables to Washington, Eikenberry said he had misgivings about sending in new troops while there are still so many questions about the leadership of Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

Obama is still close to announcing his revamped war strategy — most likely shortly after he returns from a trip to Asia that ends on Nov. 19.

But the president raised questions at a war council meeting Wednesday that could alter the dynamic of both how many additional troops are sent to Afghanistan and what the timeline would be for their presence in the war zone, according to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss Obama’s thinking.

Military officials said Obama has asked for a rewrite before and resisted what one official called a one-way highway toward war commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s recommendations for more troops. The sense that he was being rushed and railroaded has stiffened Obama’s resolve to seek information and options beyond military planning, officials said, though a substantial troop increase is still likely.

The president was considering options that include adding 30,000 or more U.S. forces to take on the Taliban in key areas of Afghanistan and to buy time for the Afghan government’s small and ill-equipped fighting forces to take over. The other three options on the table Wednesday were ranges of troop increases, from a relatively small addition of forces to the roughly 40,000 that the top U.S. general in Afghanistan prefers, according to military and other officials.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Obama prepared to accept Taliban involvement in Afghanistan Obama has achieved an even bigger way to disgrace every...
Obama likely to announce afghanistan decision by mid November according to ABC I sure hope Obama gets his golf swings in before...
8 more US troops die in Afghanistan. October 2009 now deadliest month for American forces in 8-year Afghan war While Obama continues to dither, American lives continue to be...
Afghanistan troop decision coming by Monday, November 30th? According to the AP, Obama may use an unusual evening...
Obama to send “only” 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan. Not 80,000 or even 40,000 as McChrystal requested According to Fox News, tonight’s “announcement” and photo op at...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

November 11, 2009 · Filed Under Afghanistan

Comments

One Response to “Obama will NOT accept any of the Afghanistan war options presented by his national security team”

Scott on November 12th, 2009 5:07 am

Unless we develop a comprehensive South Asia strategy, the most we can hope for is a temporary peace in Afghanistan.

What would such a strategy look like? Well, at the very least it requires some moderation of the strategic competition between India and Pakistan.

Without attention to this aspect of the problem, we really are only playing around at the edges of the conflict.

For more, see http://bit.ly/3vYHPk

Lets hear your point of view! - A warning to the liberal whiners who seem intent to flood our comment section with profanity. Save your keystrokes. The anti spamming script will just automatically delete your comment. Feel free to disagree with the host on any article posted here, but flame baits, racism, and profanity laced tirades will NOT be tolerated, and will eventually get your IP address banned!