<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama goes Hugo Chavez &#8211; scolds Supreme Court&#8217;s campaign finance ruling &#8211; Samuel Alito mumbled &#8220;not true&#8221; outload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/01/27/obama-goes-hugo-chavez-scolds-supreme-courts-campaign-finance-ruling-samuel-alito-not-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/01/27/obama-goes-hugo-chavez-scolds-supreme-courts-campaign-finance-ruling-samuel-alito-not-true/</link>
	<description>Exposing the Andrea Mitchell bias and Media bias in America! - This site is NOT politically correct! Terrorists are actually called terrorists!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/01/27/obama-goes-hugo-chavez-scolds-supreme-courts-campaign-finance-ruling-samuel-alito-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-6711</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=12083#comment-6711</guid>
		<description>&quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&quot;

What part of the above is Obama and others against the Supreme Court decision having trouble with? Is it the &quot;freedom of speech&quot; part or the &quot;right of the people peaceably to assemble?&quot; The outrage should be directed at the fact that the decision to strike down campaign finance reform was not unanimous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&#8221;</p>
<p>What part of the above is Obama and others against the Supreme Court decision having trouble with? Is it the &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; part or the &#8220;right of the people peaceably to assemble?&#8221; The outrage should be directed at the fact that the decision to strike down campaign finance reform was not unanimous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/01/27/obama-goes-hugo-chavez-scolds-supreme-courts-campaign-finance-ruling-samuel-alito-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-6705</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=12083#comment-6705</guid>
		<description>This President has a lot of swagger, even charisma. He just doesn&#039;t have any class. He just can&#039;t shake that &quot;Chicago&quot; style politics or empty campaign rhetoric, half truths, and platitudes. The law and the Constitution mean nothing to politicians that ignore the ends to justify their means. 

If I were Justice Alito I&#039;d respond to the MSM&#039;s questions by stating &quot;I was saying &#039;not true&#039; during 95% of the speech, you&#039;ll have to be more specific.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This President has a lot of swagger, even charisma. He just doesn&#8217;t have any class. He just can&#8217;t shake that &#8220;Chicago&#8221; style politics or empty campaign rhetoric, half truths, and platitudes. The law and the Constitution mean nothing to politicians that ignore the ends to justify their means. </p>
<p>If I were Justice Alito I&#8217;d respond to the MSM&#8217;s questions by stating &#8220;I was saying &#8216;not true&#8217; during 95% of the speech, you&#8217;ll have to be more specific.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 228/230 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.fireandreamitchell.com @ 2012-02-09 23:25:05 -->
