Obama book tosser was Sajid Ali Khan – an “overexuberant fan”

Well this explains why this story was completely ignored by the media. Ignore the fact the guy was as the AP described in a 3 paragraph story today, an “over-exuberant fan” of Obama. There’s another issue here which undoubtedly caused the media to ignore this story, or three tiny 3 paragraph stories about this security breach. Notice the guy’s name? Sajid Ali Khan (according to Gateway Pundit).  None of the few stories that came out today about this book toss mention the guy’s name. But Gateway Pundit mentions above that that Sajid Khan even blogged about throwing the book towards Obama. I ain’t a fan of Obama or anyone in his regime, but I still want my country’s President safe, and free from nut jobs throwing projectiles at him or her. How in the world does Obama’s security team let something like this happen? More importantly, how does the American media completely ignore a story that exposed the absolute reckless regard for the President’s safety by his security staff?

Someone if this was some “teabagger” who throw a pocket version of the constitution at him, the guy would have been hauled off to jail, and the news would go into 24/7 round the clock coverage. If you need any more proof that the American media is corrupt, then I don’t know what else there could be. Dubya Bush got a pair of shoes tossed at him, the progressive liberal media ran it over and over again and media it a big comedy routine (which it wasn’t). Obama gets a book tossed at him, by one of his own fans and the media is AWOL.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

October 11, 2010 · Filed Under Liberal Media Bias


Comments

  • http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/2utb2lsm2k7a/2927 Narayana Rao

    Yes it is security breach. But as he has written he must have thought he will shake hands and give it across. He is distant, so on the spur of the movement he tossed it. May be media did right in ignoring this news. But blogs and twitter picked it up and gave as many versions as possible.