Derrick Bell article edited by Elena Kagan in college says the U.S. Constitution is the “original sin”

elena-kagan-scotus_0So not only is Elena Kagan a conflict of interest in the ObamaCARE SCOTUS case, because she was Solicitor General for Obama while the bill was being past, but she also edited an article by Derrick Bell while at Harvard that makes clear that Critical Race Theory sees the U.S. Constitution as a form of “original sin.” So not only is Kagan a conflict of interest in maybe the most important case ever to hit the Supreme Court, she is also anti-constitution that she is supposed to uphold and defend as SCOTUS judge. Great. From Breitbart:

In November 1985, the Harvard Law Review published an article by Derrick Bell that was a “classic” in the development of Critical Race Theory. The article was edited by then-student Elena Kagan, and was cited by Prof. Charles Ogletree in support of her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Barack Obama in 2010. The article makes clear that Critical Race Theory sees the U.S. Constitution as a form of “original sin”–a view later embraced by Obama as a state legislator, and reflected in his actions and appointments. The following is an excerpt from the non-fiction portion of the article; much of what follows is a fictional story that Bell intended as a parable of racial “fantasy.” (99 Harv. L. Rev. 4)

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Comments

  • Amazingoly

    She needs to be forced to recuse herself from the March 26th mandate challenge.  This was all planned by Obama and Sebelius and it is not going to happen for them – sorry.  She was nominated by an illegal president – this will come out soon.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYBHRVKBDT6OF24QRVU4BLYWPE Anthony L

       I wish she would recuse herself from the North American continent!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYBHRVKBDT6OF24QRVU4BLYWPE Anthony L

        I wish she would recuse herself from the North American continent!