L.A. Times and Obama propaganda – new claim says no evidence found of Al Qaeda role in Libya terrorist attack
Are they really going to do this, even after all the evidence, cables and e-mails have been released? I suppose that with the cover-up of BenghaziGate, the Obama ‘team’ and propaganda media have to try something. The L.A. Times is actually spreading a propaganda piece saying that the attack on the Benghazi consulate that lead to the death of four Americans was ‘an opportunistic attack’ rather than ‘a long-planned operation.’ Seriously, they are going there again. The L.A. Times cities sources at the intelligence agencies for this bogus claim, and even say there is no evidence of Al Qaeda ordering this terrorist attack. What’s next? Are we going to go back to using the Youtube video excuse too?
This seems to be a set-up for the upcoming debate on Monday to try and save Obama’s ass.
Pingback: L.A. Times and Obama propaganda – new claim says no evidence found of Al Qaeda role in Libya terrorist attack : Fire Andrea Mitchell! « SOCIAL NETWORKING TODAY