New York Times Benghazi story contradicts it’s own reporting
The New York Times officially began it’s Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign with their bogus Benghazi story claiming that were no Al-Qaeda involved in the 9/11/2012 terrorist attack. The New York Times also repeats that abusrd lies about the attack being revenge from a Youtube video. These lies have since been debunked, including by the New York Times themselves. In fact, the New York Time’s pathetic propaganda piece to try and protect Hillary Clinton actually contradicts what the New York Times reported about Benghazi.
VIA Breitbart/KERRY PICKET
http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2013/12/29/new-york-times-benghazi-story-contradicts-reporting/BenghaziLatest RamblingsLiberal Media BiasmuslimsNew York TimesTerrorismBenghazi,Liberal Media Bias,muslims,New York Times,terrorists
Either New York Times writer David Kirkpatrick is ignoring his own colleagues’ work, or the Hillary Clinton supporters are laying out early foundations to combat what will be the biggest criticism of her tenure as Secretary of State if she decides to run for the Oval Office.
The New York Times’ assertion that Al Qaeda’s involvement in the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi is particularly questionable considering the preponderance of evidence that shows otherwise.
In his piece, Kirkpatrick writes, ”But the Republican arguments appear to conflate purely local extremist organizations like Ansar al-Shariah with Al Qaeda’s international terrorist network. The only intelligence connecting Al Qaeda to the attack was an intercepted phone call that night from a participant in the first wave of the attack to a friend in another African country who had ties to members of Al Qaeda, according to several officials briefed on the call,” he claims. “But when the friend heard the attacker’s boasts, he sounded astonished, the officials said, suggesting he had no prior knowledge of the assault.”
A September 2012 P.J. Media piece by Patrick Poole shows how bizarre the recent New York Times piece’s attempt to downplay Libya’s Ansar al-shariah’s connection to Al Qaeda. At the time, Fox News reported that Abu Sufyan Bin Qumu, a former GITMO detainee and head of Ansar al-Shariah, was on the ground in Benghazi the week of the attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans:
A former Guantanamo Bay detainee with Al Qaeda ties was in Benghazi the night of the Sept. 11 attack, according to a source on the ground in Libya.
The source told Fox News that ex-detainee Sufian bin Qumu, who is suspected of running camps in eastern Libya where some of the assailants trained, is also a “respected member” of Ansar al-Sharia — one of the Islamist groups identified in State Department email traffic two hours after the attack.
Two sources familiar with the investigation, when asked about bin Qumu’s whereabouts the night of the attack, did not dispute the claim he was in Benghazi.
While it is not clear whether bin Qumu was directing the assault, his security file from Guantanamo may be revealing. Having already trained in Usama bin Laden’s camps, in 1998 bin Qumu joined the Taliban in Pakistan and “communicated with likely extremist elements via radio during this period indicating a position of leadership,” the file shows.
|Comment Policy: Everyone is free to comment, even progressive liberals. If you want to debate the posts, or others, do so in a respectful way. Do not turn this comment section into to leftist insult cesspool. Leftist insults and violence related keywords will trigger moderation. Also, all off site links most be verified by moderators. You can thank leftist spammers for this policy.|