The SLIME at ABC news release names/photos of interrogation specialists!
This is INEXCUSABLE!!! The bottom-feeding traitorous slime at ABC news (Brian Ross, Matthew Cole, and Josepth Rhee) have released details, including names and photos, of the experts who were responsible for helping protect this nation against another terrorist attack:
The CIA’s $1,000 a Day Specialists on Waterboarding, Interrogations
You really need to pray for the individuals mentions by ABC and their families. How long will be before Acorn has a chartered bus to target these people’s houses?
Time Magazine and ABC trying to defend and downplay Botox Pelosi’s abuse of military aircraft
Air Pelosi Thanks for the Photo Bucktown
What a shock. Maybe its a more of a shocker that these two left wing moonbat “news organizations” are covering it in the first place, and not just downright igoring what Juidical Watch uncovered the otherday. According to ABC:
In fact, it appears that Pelosi uses military aircraft less often than her predecessor, former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert.
And according to Karen Tumulty of Time Magazine while basicaly linking over the ABC story, she Tumulty also smear’s Michelle Malkin for mentioning the story in the first place:
There was much tut-tutting over Judicial Watch’s allegation earlier this week that Nancy Pelosi “treats the Air Force like her personal airline.” But over at ABC, Jonathan Karl and Luis Martinez actually read this “trove” of documents on what Michelle Malkin calls “Queen Nancy’s military air travel.” And what did they find?
Stephanopolous trying to cover up Hussein Obama and Emanuel – Only *1* call made by Emanuel to Blago?
The media is already doing damage control for Hussein Obama and BlagObamaGate, but they either can’t seem to add, or just are completely ignoring what the FBI said it had regarding the number of phone calls between Blago and Emanuel. George Stephanopolous reported today on ABC that Barack Hussein Obama’s incoming team will reveal that Rahm Emanuel only had one direct contact with Governor Rod Blagojevich during the latter’s attempts to sell the Senate seat, and that the replacement of Obama barely got mentioned. This is about 20 calls less than what the Chicago Sun-Times’ sources said that the FBI had 21 separate calls from Emanuel on the wiretaps. The numbers will not match up.
Sources tell me that the Obama team’s review of contacts with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich will show that Rahm Emanuel had only one phone conversation with Blagojevich.
The contact, described as a “pro-forma” courtesy call, came as Emanuel was named Chief of Staff for Obama. Most of the discussion concerned Emanuel’s Congressional seat (which had previously been held by Blagojevich), with only a “passing reference” to the Senate vacancy, according to these sources. No deal for the Senate vacancy was discussed.
However, Emanuel had closer contacts and deeper conversations with Blagojevich’s chief of staff John Harris:
The sources add that the report will show Emanuel also had four phone calls with Blagojevich Chief of Staff John Harris. During those conversations, the Senate seat was discussed. The pros and cons of various candidates were reviewed, and the sources say that Emanuel repeatedly reminded Harris that Blagojevich should focus on the message the pick would send about the governor and his administration.
Sources also confirm that Emanuel made the case for picking Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett during at least one of the conversations. In the course of that conversation, Harris asked if in return for picking Jarrett, “all we get is appreciation, right?” “Right,” Emanuel responded.
Palin’s Alaska Church Damaged in Suspicious Fire
Of course, hardly any liberal MSM has posted anything about this, other than the AP, and Fox News (highly regarded as part of the Right Wing Conspiracy) by the liberal loons. Had this been Hussein Obama’s racist church, with that scumbag pastor Rev Wright, this would be BREAKING NEWS flashing all over CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc. Here is the info from Fox News and Hotair:
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Gov. Sarah Palin’s home church has been badly damaged in a suspicious fire.
Larry Kroon, pastor of the Wasilla Bible Church, estimates damages at more than $1 million to the church.
Kroon declined to say if the blaze was politically based or directed at Palin, the failed Republican vice presidential candidate.
Kroon says the fire broke out Friday night while a small group of women were working on crafts. They were alerted to the blaze by a fire alarm.
Kroon says he was called and by the time he got to the church, smoke was pouring out of the building. Sprinklers kept the fire from spreading beyond offices and classrooms.
Authorities are not immediately commenting, but Kroon says he’s been told the fire is being investigated as a crime.
BlagObamaGate day 4: Rahm Emanuel looking for more dead fish to send to people
Almost makes you want to shed a tear for poor little Rahm Emanuel. Poor little Rahm is now saying he’s “beet-red and pissed” at the LIBERAL biased media because ,he can’t go anywhere without someone asking question about his role in Blago-gate.While details continue to come out about BlagObamaGate, like today’s news that Emanuel spoke with Blago “on multiple occasions” about Hussein Obama’s Senate seat. Howeven, Rahm is rather good at hiding behind his kids. In other Blago corruption news, Illinois’ Attorney General moved today to disconnect Governor Rod Blagojevich from executive power through the judiciary today, rather than wait for the legislature to act.
Group Boycotts Oprah for Palin Diss
Obama biased talk show host Oprah Winfrey is starting to feel the heat from her complete diss of Sarah Palin, not allowing her on the Oprah show, until AFTER the election (yet has had Obama one twice already). According to MomLogic, the Florida Federation of Republican Women has launched a national boycott against Oprah, urging women to turn off her show and cancel their subscription to O magazine. They say it’s unfair that Obama, whom Oprah has endorsed and campaigned with, appeared on her couch twice before accepting the nomination, but that Winfrey refuses to book Palin.
But Oprah says, “At the beginning of this campaign, when I decided I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates.”
ABC and Charlie Gibson bias exposed: ABC News Edited Out Key Parts of Sarah Palin Interview
Newsbusters has exposed more media bias in favor or B Hussein Obama, this time on the whole Sarah Palin/Charlie Gibson interview. A transcript of the unedited interview of Sarah Palin by Charles Gibson clearly shows that ABC News apparently edited out several crucial portions of the interview that showed Palin as knowledgeable or presented her answers out of context. The sections edited out by ABC News are in bold. The first edit shows Palin responding about meeting with foreign leaders but this was actually in response to a question Gibson asked several questions earlier:
GIBSON: Have you ever met a foreign head of state?
PALIN: There in the state of Alaska, our international trade activities bring in many leaders of other countries.
GIBSON: And all governors deal with trade delegations.
PALIN: Right.
GIBSON: Who act at the behest of their governments.
PALIN: Right, right.
GIBSON: I’m talking about somebody who’s a head of state, who can negotiate for that country. Ever met one?
PALIN: I have not and I think if you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you. But, Charlie, again, we’ve got to remember what the desire is in this nation at this time. It is for no more politics as usual and somebody’s big, fat resume maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where, yes, they’ve had opportunities to meet heads of state … these last couple of weeks … it has been overwhelming to me that confirmation of the message that Americans are getting sick and tired of that self-dealing and kind of that closed door, good old boy network that has been the Washington elite.
Next we see that Palin was not nearly as hostile towards Russia as was presented in the edited interview:
GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.
PALIN: Sure.
GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.
The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?
PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…
GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.
PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.
And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?
PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.
We also see from Palin’s following remark, which was also edited out, that she is far from some sort of latter day Cold Warrior which the edited interview made her seem to be:
We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We’ve learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.
We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.
Palin’s extended remarks about defending our NATO allies were edited out to make it seem that she was ready to go to war with Russia.
GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?
PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.
But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.
We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.
GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.
PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.
And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.
It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.
His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.
That answer presented Palin as a bit too knowledgeable for the purposes of ABC News and was, of course, edited out. Palin’s answers about a nuclear Iran were carefully edited to the point where she was even edited out in mid-sentence to make it seem that Palin favored unilateral action against that country:
GIBSON: Let me turn to Iran. Do you consider a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat to Israel?
PALIN: I believe that under the leadership of Ahmadinejad, nuclear weapons in the hands of his government are extremely dangerous to everyone on this globe, yes.
GIBSON: So what should we do about a nuclear Iran? John McCain said the only thing worse than a war with Iran would be a nuclear Iran. John Abizaid said we may have to live with a nuclear Iran. Who’s right?
PALIN: No, no. I agree with John McCain that nuclear weapons in the hands of those who would seek to destroy our allies, in this case, we’re talking about Israel, we’re talking about Ahmadinejad’s comment about Israel being the “stinking corpse, should be wiped off the face of the earth,” that’s atrocious. That’s unacceptable.
GIBSON: So what do you do about a nuclear Iran?
PALIN: We have got to make sure that these weapons of mass destruction, that nuclear weapons are not given to those hands of Ahmadinejad, not that he would use them, but that he would allow terrorists to be able to use them. So we have got to put the pressure on Iran and we have got to count on our allies to help us, diplomatic pressure.
GIBSON: But, Governor, we’ve threatened greater sanctions against Iran for a long time. It hasn’t done any good. It hasn’t stemmed their nuclear program.
PALIN: We need to pursue those and we need to implement those. We cannot back off. We cannot just concede that, oh, gee, maybe they’re going to have nuclear weapons, what can we do about it. No way, not Americans. We do not have to stand for that.
Laughably, a remark by Gibson that indicated he agreed with Palin was edited out:
PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.
But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.
That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie. And I do believe, though, that this war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the right thing. It’s an unfortunate thing, because war is hell and I hate war, and, Charlie, today is the day that I send my first born, my son, my teenage son overseas with his Stryker brigade, 4,000 other wonderful American men and women, to fight for our country, for democracy, for our freedoms.
Charlie, those are freedoms that too many of us just take for granted. I hate war and I want to see war ended. We end war when we see victory, and we do see victory in sight in Iraq.
GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”
Gibson took her point about Lincoln’s words but we wouldn’t know that by watching the interview since it was left on the cutting room floor. I urge everybody to see just how the unedited version of the first interview compared to what we saw on television by checking out the full transcript. It is a fascinating look into media manipulation via skillful editing.
Flags rescued from Democratic convention trash bins!
Well i already knew Obama was low, didn’t really care about his country, and is only interested in promoting himself, but this may finally take the cake. We all know about Obama’s wife finally becoming “proud of her country” in Februay of this year. We also know about Obama’s refusal to wear the American Flag pin, which he was later pressured into doing, and the refusal of Obama to put his hand over heart during the playing of the national anthem, but folks, Obama has gone even lower. McCain supporters, rescued 12,000 miniature American flags from the site of Barack Obama’s nomination acceptance speech last Thursday, redistributed the orphan flags to audience members ahead of a McCain rally in Colorado Springs on Saturday. Accoring to Fox News, the flags were discovered by a vendor at Denver’s Invesco Field after the conclusion of the Democratic National Convention. The vendor supposedly found trash bags full of flags in and near garbage bins, and turned them over to the McCain campaign. Boy Scouts were sorting through 84 bags of flags in Colorado on Saturday, before a McCain supporter had veterans distribute them to the audience. To add to the disgust, not one of the three major networks, CBS,NBC, or ABC even bothered mentioning this controversy on their nightly news. CNN barely even made a mention of this. Can’t say i’m terribly surprised.
What a country we live in. To have someone like Obama running for president who’s wive hated American for her 44 years living in this country, the candidate himself showing no remorse over attending an American hate filed church for 20+ years, and someone who is best buds with a known terrorist like William Ayers. Maybe Oprah just payed for those flags.
Oprah bias exposed – No Palin until after the election!
After yesterday’s Drudge Report article about how many members of “Oprah’s staff” were interested in having her on the show, and many e-mailers from her website also requesting Palin make an appearance, it seems that Obama homer Oprah Winfrey has decided (and i quote, from this ABCNEWS article): “At the beginning of the presidential campaign, when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates”. Now correct me if i’m wrong here Oppy, but hasn’t your lover Obama been on your show TWICE already? Oprah, you are just another in the long list of hypocrits being exposed for who you really are. You don’t care about other woman’s interests. You simply care about YOUR interests and Obama’s. I find Oprah’s blantant homerism to be racist. Had the situation been reversed and there was a presidential candidate running with an African-American woman running with them as VP, I guarantee you that she would be on your show! Oprah, you are nothing but a racist hypocrit!
Oprah Winfrey refuses to put Sarah Palin on her show!
How dare Oprah! A blatant Obama jock sniffer, she refuses to put Sarah Palin on the Oprah show! Despite the fact, according to The Drudge Report, “Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on,” an insider explains. “Oprah’s website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama.” Whats the matter Oprah? Are you scared that Palin is going to expose the fraud that Obama is? Are you afraid that Palin may open up a can of worms by mentioning Obama’s relations with terrorist Willaim Ayers? Are you afraid Oprah that Palin may expose more about Obama attending Reverend Wright’s congregation for the last 20 years while he preached his racist views and hate for America? A complete quote from the Drudge Report follows below, including Oprah’s obvious disagreement:
Read more


Chris Dodd - Mortgage Fraud / AIG
Tim Geither - Tax Cheat
Hillary Clinton - Overseas conflicts of interests
Eric Holder - Pardons terrorists and Marc Rich