Former presidential candidate John Edwards abandoned his long denial that he had fathered a child during an affair with a campaign aide and admitted today that he is the father of the almost 2-year-old girl.
The senator admits he fathered a child with a former campaign worker.

“I am Quinn’s father,” Edwards said in the bombshell statement this morning. “I will do everything in my power to provide her with the love and support she deserves.”

The former senator and presidential hopeful had an affair with campaign cinematographer Rielle Hunter, 45, and she later give birth to Frances Quinn.

Edwards’ admission comes a week before the man who had claimed he was the baby’s father, former aide Andrew Young, was scheduled to appear in an exclusive interview on “20/20″.

In an excerpt from his upcoming interview with ABC News’s Bob Woodruff, Young alleges that Edwards asked him to arrange a fake a paternity test.

“Get a doctor to fake the DNA results,” Young said Edwards told him. “And he asked me … to steal a diaper from the baby so he could secretly do a DNA test to find out if this [was] indeed his child.”

Related posts:

1. Spitzer mocks Sanford – John Edwards/Rielle Hunter sex tape tale revealed! Last week Mark Sanford became the butt of all liberal...
2. Rielle Hunter baby’s DNA tests are in, and the father is…… John Edwards A secret DNA test proves former presidential candidate John Edwards...
3. “Leave my family alone…I hope you die!” said Elizabeth Edwards to Rielle Hunter This is the National Enquirer story so you can choose...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The CIA’s $1,000 a Day Specialists on Waterboarding, Interrogations

You really need to pray for the individuals mentions by ABC and their families. How long will be before Acorn has a chartered bus to target these people’s houses?

Well… after all the brouhaha from the self-righteous Left during the Valerie Plame incident calling for a special investigator, will we see the same here? This was OBVIOUSLY leaked from the White House… was it done on Obama’s orders?

And just when you thought things couldn’t go any lower with the slugs in this administration.

ABC is now officially equal to NBC.

Related posts:

1. Carrie Prejean getting the Sarah Palin treatment – flaming liberals release “racy” or partially nude photos of Prejean With liberals set up to try and destroy Carrie Prejean’s...
2. Hussein Obama’s latest 180 – No release of Abu Ghraib photos – ACLU is fuming mad For the first time in his adult presidenticy, Hussein Obama...
3. ABC’s World News Tonight officially becomes Hussein Obama propoganda news tonight on June 24th Its really beginning to get difficult when distinguishing networks anymore....

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Air Pelosi Thanks for the Photo Bucktown

What a shock. Maybe its a more of a shocker that these two left wing moonbat “news organizations” are covering it in the first place, and not just downright igoring what Juidical Watch uncovered the otherday. According to ABC:

In fact, it appears that Pelosi uses military aircraft less often than her predecessor, former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert.

And according to Karen Tumulty of Time Magazine while basicaly linking over the ABC story, she Tumulty also smear’s Michelle Malkin for mentioning the story in the first place:

There was much tut-tutting over Judicial Watch’s allegation earlier this week that Nancy Pelosi “treats the Air Force like her personal airline.” But over at ABC, Jonathan Karl and Luis Martinez actually read this “trove” of documents on what Michelle Malkin calls “Queen Nancy’s military air travel.” And what did they find?

Related posts:

1. Nancy Pelosi exposed as a war criminal! Nancy Pelosi lied, the terrorists and botox cried! 5/19/09 Video courtesy of the GOP with h/t to...
2. Botox Pelosi the Witch – I don’t care about trust! Botox face Nancy Pelosi is one of the most despised...
3. Botox Pelosi: It’s almost immoral what they are doing (re insurance company) I think Botox Nancy Pelosi confused insurance companies with the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Sources tell me that the Obama team’s review of contacts with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich will show that Rahm Emanuel had only one phone conversation with Blagojevich.

The contact, described as a “pro-forma” courtesy call, came as Emanuel was named Chief of Staff for Obama. Most of the discussion concerned Emanuel’s Congressional seat (which had previously been held by Blagojevich), with only a “passing reference” to the Senate vacancy, according to these sources. No deal for the Senate vacancy was discussed.

However, Emanuel had closer contacts and deeper conversations with Blagojevich’s chief of staff John Harris:

The sources add that the report will show Emanuel also had four phone calls with Blagojevich Chief of Staff John Harris. During those conversations, the Senate seat was discussed. The pros and cons of various candidates were reviewed, and the sources say that Emanuel repeatedly reminded Harris that Blagojevich should focus on the message the pick would send about the governor and his administration.

Sources also confirm that Emanuel made the case for picking Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett during at least one of the conversations. In the course of that conversation, Harris asked if in return for picking Jarrett, “all we get is appreciation, right?” “Right,” Emanuel responded.

Related posts:

1. Blago: Rhambo Deadfish Emanuel wants to leave the Obama staff in 2010 and return to Congress According to Yahoo, Ousted Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich says in...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Gov. Sarah Palin’s home church has been badly damaged in a suspicious fire.

Larry Kroon, pastor of the Wasilla Bible Church, estimates damages at more than $1 million to the church.

Kroon declined to say if the blaze was politically based or directed at Palin, the failed Republican vice presidential candidate.

Kroon says the fire broke out Friday night while a small group of women were working on crafts. They were alerted to the blaze by a fire alarm.

Kroon says he was called and by the time he got to the church, smoke was pouring out of the building. Sprinklers kept the fire from spreading beyond offices and classrooms.

Authorities are not immediately commenting, but Kroon says he’s been told the fire is being investigated as a crime.

Related posts:

1. Fire David Letterman protests June 16th, 4:30PM EST in NY: Letterman “apologizes” to Palin family | CBS loses an advertiser! If you happen to be in New York on Tuesday,...
2. Sarah Palin’s farewell address to Alaska – plus a few parting shots to the state run media and liberal Hollywood trash! Come Monday, I’m wondering what will go more play on...
3. CNN Poll: Palin’s popularity on the rise While Obama sits at 48% approval rating with all the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Related posts:

1. Blago: Rhambo Deadfish Emanuel wants to leave the Obama staff in 2010 and return to Congress According to Yahoo, Ousted Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich says in...
2. Rahm Emanuel – Fox News isn’t a news organization “it has a perspective” So Obama sent two of his lackeys out today to...
3. Rahm Emanuel’s threat to Ben Nelson – Either vote for ObamaCARE or we put Nebraska’s Offutt Air Force Base on the BRAC list So what’s more important? Our national security or a government...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

But Oprah says, “At the beginning of this campaign, when I decided I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates.”

Related posts:

1. Sarah Palin to be on the Oprah show on November 16th Unless Sarah Palin decides to tear this fat blimp Obama...
2. Left wing nutjob Sarah Palin haters to release hit piece on day of book release Going Rouge: Sarah Palin An American Nightmare Start-up publisher “OR Books” has announced plans to release a...
3. Thanks to Sarah Palin, Oprah has biggest ratings in two years Not even when Obama or his witch of a wife...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

GIBSON: Have you ever met a foreign head of state?

PALIN: There in the state of Alaska, our international trade activities bring in many leaders of other countries.

GIBSON: And all governors deal with trade delegations.

PALIN: Right.

GIBSON: Who act at the behest of their governments.

PALIN: Right, right.

GIBSON: I’m talking about somebody who’s a head of state, who can negotiate for that country. Ever met one?

PALIN: I have not and I think if you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you. But, Charlie, again, we’ve got to remember what the desire is in this nation at this time. It is for no more politics as usual and somebody’s big, fat resume maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where, yes, they’ve had opportunities to meet heads of state … these last couple of weeks … it has been overwhelming to me that confirmation of the message that Americans are getting sick and tired of that self-dealing and kind of that closed door, good old boy network that has been the Washington elite.

Next we see that Palin was not nearly as hostile towards Russia as was presented in the edited interview:

GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.

PALIN: Sure.

GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.

The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?

PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…

GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.

PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.

And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?

PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

We also see from Palin’s following remark, which was also edited out, that she is far from some sort of latter day Cold Warrior which the edited interview made her seem to be:

We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We’ve learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.

We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

Palin’s extended remarks about defending our NATO allies were edited out to make it seem that she was ready to go to war with Russia.

GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.

But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.

We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.

GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.

PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.

And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.

It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.

His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.

That answer presented Palin as a bit too knowledgeable for the purposes of ABC News and was, of course, edited out. Palin’s answers about a nuclear Iran were carefully edited to the point where she was even edited out in mid-sentence to make it seem that Palin favored unilateral action against that country:

GIBSON: Let me turn to Iran. Do you consider a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat to Israel?

PALIN: I believe that under the leadership of Ahmadinejad, nuclear weapons in the hands of his government are extremely dangerous to everyone on this globe, yes.

GIBSON: So what should we do about a nuclear Iran? John McCain said the only thing worse than a war with Iran would be a nuclear Iran. John Abizaid said we may have to live with a nuclear Iran. Who’s right?

PALIN: No, no. I agree with John McCain that nuclear weapons in the hands of those who would seek to destroy our allies, in this case, we’re talking about Israel, we’re talking about Ahmadinejad’s comment about Israel being the “stinking corpse, should be wiped off the face of the earth,” that’s atrocious. That’s unacceptable.

GIBSON: So what do you do about a nuclear Iran?

PALIN: We have got to make sure that these weapons of mass destruction, that nuclear weapons are not given to those hands of Ahmadinejad, not that he would use them, but that he would allow terrorists to be able to use them. So we have got to put the pressure on Iran and we have got to count on our allies to help us, diplomatic pressure.

GIBSON: But, Governor, we’ve threatened greater sanctions against Iran for a long time. It hasn’t done any good. It hasn’t stemmed their nuclear program.

PALIN: We need to pursue those and we need to implement those. We cannot back off. We cannot just concede that, oh, gee, maybe they’re going to have nuclear weapons, what can we do about it. No way, not Americans. We do not have to stand for that.

Laughably, a remark by Gibson that indicated he agreed with Palin was edited out:

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie. And I do believe, though, that this war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the right thing. It’s an unfortunate thing, because war is hell and I hate war, and, Charlie, today is the day that I send my first born, my son, my teenage son overseas with his Stryker brigade, 4,000 other wonderful American men and women, to fight for our country, for democracy, for our freedoms.

Charlie, those are freedoms that too many of us just take for granted. I hate war and I want to see war ended. We end war when we see victory, and we do see victory in sight in Iraq.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Gibson took her point about Lincoln’s words but we wouldn’t know that by watching the interview since it was left on the cutting room floor. I urge everybody to see just how the unedited version of the first interview compared to what we saw on television  by checking out the full transcript. It is a fascinating look into media manipulation via skillful editing.

Related posts:

1. David Alexrod on Katie Couric interview with Sarah Palin: a public colonoscopie | Old Witch Helen Thomas: She saved the country You know for someone who’s 15 minutes of fame were...
2. Charlie Gibson tells WLS radio – Uh, i never heard about the ACORN story You want another example of the “wonderful” media in this...
3. Laura Ingraham destroys Charlie Gibson on ABC’s This Week “roundtable” The “Roundtable” of This Week on ABC discussed the White...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

What a country we live in. To have someone like Obama running for president who’s wive hated American for her 44 years living in this country, the candidate himself showing no remorse over attending an American hate filed church for 20+ years, and someone who is best buds with a known terrorist like William Ayers. Maybe Oprah just payed for those flags.

Related posts:

1. White Trash Megan Fox: If only we didn’t have these white-trash Bible-beating hillbillies in middle America When a white trash such as Megan Fox bemoans others...
2. Dallas Marine Vet’s US/Military Flags torched – Flood of offers pour in to help him replace them Well its good to know theres at least some good...
3. ACORN tries selling Gadsen flags at 9/12 DC march, starts fight, gets chased away This new video is a small group of ACORN losers...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Related posts:

1. Michelle Obama – greatest First Lady we’ve ever known according to Oprah Oprah the blimp is still her some Michelle Mrs. America...
2. Sarah Palin to be on the Oprah show on November 16th Unless Sarah Palin decides to tear this fat blimp Obama...
3. Thanks to Sarah Palin, Oprah has biggest ratings in two years Not even when Obama or his witch of a wife...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

BIG DILEMMA: OPRAH BALKS AT HOSTING SARAH PALIN; STAFF DIVIDED
Fri Sep 05 2008 08:55:46 ET

Oprah Winfrey may have introduced Democrat Barack Obama to the women of America — but the talkshow queen is not rushing to embrace the first woman on a Republican presidential ticket!

Oprah’s staff is sharply divided on the merits of booking Sarah Palin, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

“Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on,” an insider explains. “Oprah’s website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama.”

One executive close to Winfrey is warning any Palin ban could ignite a dramatic backlash!

It is not clear if Oprah has softened her position after watching Palin’s historic convention speech.

Last year, Winfrey blocked an appearance by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, timed to a promotional tour of his autobiography.

Oprah and executive producer Sheri Salata, who has contributed thousands of dollars to Obama’s campaign, refused requests for comment.

Developing…

OPRAH’S STATEMENT: “The item in today’s Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show. At the beginning of this Presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over.”

Some related articles about Oprah’s refusal to put Palin on the show are also available for interesting reads:

Newsday: Five Reasons Why Palin Should Appear…

ABCNEWS: Is Oprah Biased?

Related posts:

1. Sarah Palin to be on the Oprah show on November 16th Unless Sarah Palin decides to tear this fat blimp Obama...
2. Palin-Palooza – MSNBC uses fake photos to bag on Sarah Palin Sarah Palin has posted a new entry on facebook reminding...
3. Thanks to Sarah Palin, Oprah has biggest ratings in two years Not even when Obama or his witch of a wife...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.