“We need somebody who’s gonna stick up for what’s right. Somebody with guts,” Grayson said.

Looks like the loony toon is off his meds again. I’m sure “Taliban Dan” is shaking in his boots. Who knows, the idiots in this district elected Grayson once. I suppose anything is possible.

“Be An Adult About This Congressman!”

to watch snarky Alan Grayson replied:

“Oh Please! Let’s Not Insult Each Other! I thought this was the intelligent network!”

If you want to skip the early boring parts, you can start the video at around 8:40 to watch the fireworks.

“They can buy 20,000 jars of their favorite mustard, Grey Poupon,” he said, pointing to one chart on the House floor Wednesday night. He bases the figure on the $83,000 he says the average person making $1.4 million would save with a tax cut.

I wonder how many jars of Grey Poupon Alan Grayson will be able to buy in the rubber room reserved for him in Florida?

I especially loved the part where Eric Bolling said to Grayson near the end of the interview:

It’s almost like I’m talking to a medicated person right now

“This is a new day for our Country and I am thankful to be a part of it. This is a huge victory for people who are tired of the politics of personal destruction. We ran a positive campaign against a broken system. Now it’s time to begin the work of fixing it.”

Biden will attend an event on Monday for the first-term Democratic lawmaker, who’s made waves during his term in Congress by taking outspoken liberal stances on issues.

Biden will attend a reception on Monday for Grayson following a speech at a conference for the International Association of Chiefs of Police in Orlando.

Even in some races where Democrats did spend money, their advertising indicates little more than a token effort at salvaging seats that are also likely to fall to the GOP. The DCCC is spending just $30,000 for Rep. Steve Driehaus (D-Ohio), who polls show trailing ex-Rep. Steve Chabot (R) by wide margins. That follows reports that the DCCC was pulling out of Driehaus’ district.

Democrats are only spending $42,000 on behalf of Rep. Chet Edwards (D-Texas), who trails businessman Bill Flores (R) in most polling. Rep. Jim Marshall (D), a perpetually vulnerable incumbent in a deeply conservative district in southern Georgia, is getting just $9,000 in assistance, likely for radio advertising, as he faces state Rep. Austin Scott (R). And Rep. John Hall (D-NY), who faces a surprisingly stiff challenge in ophthalmologist Nan Hayworth (R), will benefit from just $83,000 in advertising this week.

Alaska Sen.Lisa Murkowski, who Miller beat in an Aug. 24 Republican primary, and Sitka Mayor Scott McAdams (D) were slated to face off Monday night at an Alaska Dispatch debate; Miller said he had a scheduling conflict and would not be able to participate.

The article basically is a bashfest on Republicans until the end when they break down and have to reveal the results of the latest NRCC polls they found. So for an easy breakdown of the bad news for the Washington Post, Nation Review Online broke down the polls that they discovered and buried at the end of the story. While all of these results are great news, the best is obviously Alan Grayson getting his a*s handed to him by 16 points to Daniel Webster. Mr. I’ don’t care about the constitution Phil Hare is also losing:

FL-8: Daniel Webster (R) 46, Alan Grayson* (D) 30
PA 3: Mike Kelly (R) 56, Kathy Dahlkemper* (D) 39
OH-15: Steve Stivers (R) 51, Mary Jo Kilroy* (D) 39
WA-3: Jaime Herrera (R) 51, Denny Heck (D) 38
NY-20: Chris Gibson (R) 48, Scott Murphy* (D) 45
MA-10: Jeff Perry (R) 44, Bill Keating (D) 42
IL-17: Bobby Schilling (R) 44, Phil Hare* (D) 41
PA-10: Tom Marino (R) 44, Chris Carney* (D) 37
VA-9: Morgan Griffith (R) 44, Rick Boucher* (D) 44
OR-5: Scott Bruun (R) 44, Kurt Schrader (D) 42
OH-6: Bill Johnson (R) 40, Charlie Wilson* (D) 40
(* = denotes incumbent)

That didn’t stop the Florida chapter of the National Organization for Women from endorsing Alan Grayson though. More from Pundit Press:

When asked for a statement, President of the Florida chapter Donna Slutiak stated that Grayson is “100 percent on women’s issues. He’s never let us down yet.” On Webster, Slutiak commented that, “We’ll be set back 20 years if he’s elected.”

The endorsement comes at an odd time, especially in the aftermath of Alan Grayson’s twitter and Facebook “war” with Sarah Palin, in which Grayson stated that Palin had no “head or heart:”

What a plunge! I guess thats what you call effective progressive advertising. As such the New York Times also now predicts that Daniel Webster will win this race by nearly 4 points. Right before this Grayson’s ad came out, they basically had the predicted outcome tied. One week Grayson would have a small lead, the next week Webster would have a small lead. Yet, the New York Times still rates this race as a “Toss-up.” The much more reliable Cook Political report a href=”http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/09/cook-moves-graysons-district-to-leans-republican/” target=”_blank”>however has moved this race to “Leans-Republican” though. The Orlando Sentinel posted what Charlie Cook said, via the Republican Party of Florida:

Lean Republican. Like a bad disease, this race is so toxic thanks to Grayson that both parties wish they could quarantine it. And House Democrats, who point to Grayson’s self-funding capabilities as an excuse not to get involved, basically can. But for now, the preponderance of evidence suggests that Grayson’s scorched earth “Taliban Dan” attacks against GOP state Sen. Dan Webster are backfiring. Editorial boards have excoriated Grayson for taking Webster’s words grossly out of context by rolling footage of Webster saying “she should submit to me,” when Webster had actually warned husbands against that advice. As one Republican noted, painting Webster as anti-woman is a curious line of attack considering Grayson referred to a lobbyist as a “K Street whore” just last year.

Alan Grayson has been subpoenaed to testify on Oct. 21 in a civil case that claimed he paid roughly $40,000 to a consulting company created by a tea party activist.

The case stemmed from defamation lawsuit filed by tea party activist and longtime conservative campaign consultant Doug Guetzloe against three people who claimed that Guetzloe and his Tea Party of Florida group “hijacked” the name of the national tea party movement.

As is typical for progressive nuts such as Grayson, facts are a stubborn thing. According to Gateway Pundit, Daniel Webster didn’t “refuse the call to service,” as claimed in a vicious TV ad. The fact is that Daniel Webster, a former Florida Senate majority leader was given routine student deferments until he completed his undergraduate degree. He then reported for a military physical and was disqualified for medical reasons. It’s not quite like the ’60s progressive dope smoking hippies burning their draft card like Grayson probably did. WESH TV has posted a video on Youtube about this scandal (They don’t allow embedding).

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn65rjFgycA

“Here I am, the only Member of Congress who actually worked as an economist. And she’s, this lobbyist, this K Street whore, is trying to teach me about economics.”

Grayson also recently, appeared on the Dylan Ratigan show and said

“Well, I have the benefit of working as an economist for 4 years before I was elected to Congress, and that does give me insight into how all this works.”

Turns out Alan Grayson: YOU LIE!

According to Lee Doren, the nut Grayson originally worked as an attorney and was the President if IDT Corporation. But it turns out Grayson was never an Economist.

Doren called Grayson’s office to find out the truth. The person Doren spoke with over the phone said three times that he definitely is not an economist. He definitely did not work as an economist. He is a lawyer. Doren asked about his Wikipedia page that said he worked as an economist for 2 years.

The person Doren spoke with, said the Wikipedia page is not true, he never worked as an economist.

His staff member specifically said Grayson would NEVER say he worked as an economist because it is not true.

Unanswered question: How did Alan Grayson know about this meeting? Who informed him? Was this staged?

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Px5hJmFLqA

I hear someone in the video saying to Grayson “be professional Congressman.” Does anyone think Grayson is even capable of being professional after the past 2 years?

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57SFCtqFFn0

Matthew Falconer, candidate for Orange County Mayor, quickly challenged Alan’s rudeness. Grayson demanded not to be interrupted, but Falconer quickly reminded the congressman that he is in fact interrupting their meeting.

Linda O’Keefe, member of the Orange County Republican Executive Committee and extraordinary patriot volunteer with the Orlando Tea Party said, “I’m wondering if Grayson realizes that we do still, for now, have the right to assemble! But can’t we have a meeting without being interrupted by our congressman?”

Currently, there are 12 Republican candidates looking to send Alan Grayson to the unemployment line in November.

Tom Tillison of the Tea Party Patriots Live radio show and the Orlando Tea Party, had quite a lively discussion with Alan afterwards for 10 minutes. Tillison said, “I let him know that he’s a congressman and he needs to act like one. I reminded him that these are his constinuents.” Tillison asked Grayson, “Don’t you feel that you at least owe them an explanation for your recent votes?”, to which Alan replied, “I don’t owe them anything, they’re trying to defeat me.”

Tillison followed, “You are a U.S. Congressman and you approach these people acting like a thug.”….to which Grayson responded that he was “being attacked.”

Congrerssman Alan Grayson said, “There are 308 million people that pay my salary. Do you know what that breaks down to per person?” After Tom shrugged his shoulders insinuating ‘I don’t know’, Grayson repeatd the question with emphasis. Tom quickly replied, “I have no idea”. ”It’s pennies on the dollar”, said Grayson. He later said, “I took a pay cut when I took this job”.

Grayson threatened Falconer by saying that he’ll spend thousands of dollars making sure he doesn’t get elected. Question: Is it legal or atleast unethical for a sitting congressman to threaten to influence a local election? Why is Matt Falconer, running for local Mayor, even on the radar of Alan Grayson?