<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fire Andrea Mitchell! &#187; Charlie Rangel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/category/charlie-rangel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com</link>
	<description>Exposing the Andrea Mitchell bias and Media bias in America! - This site is NOT politically correct! Terrorists are actually called terrorists!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Peaceful! Left wing thugs rush Charlie Rangel who was supposed to speak at Occupy Wall Street &#8220;protest&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/10/01/peaceful-left-wing-thugs-rush-charlie-rangel-who-was-supposed-to-speak-at-occupy-wall-street-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/10/01/peaceful-left-wing-thugs-rush-charlie-rangel-who-was-supposed-to-speak-at-occupy-wall-street-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 04:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Wing Extremists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=27319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Far be it from me to defend a corrupt Marxist Democrat like Charlie Rangel. Well, i&#8217;m not even going to attempt to defend him. The fact that Rangel appeared at the anti capitalist, George Soros group funded, Occupy Wall Street &#8220;protest&#8221; speaks worlds for the corrupt politician. Rather, i&#8217;d like to expose how &#8220;peaceful&#8221; these Communists/Hippies/Anarchists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" title="" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" rel=""><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="corrupt-charlie-rangel" /></a>Far be it from me to defend a corrupt Marxist Democrat like Charlie Rangel. Well, i&#8217;m not even going to attempt to defend him. The fact that Rangel appeared at the anti capitalist, <a href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/10/01/meet-the-hippies-potheads-and-communists-who-want-to-bring-capitalism-down-at-occupy-wall-street/" target="_blank">George Soros group funded</a>, Occupy Wall Street &#8220;protest&#8221; speaks worlds for the corrupt politician. Rather, i&#8217;d like to expose how &#8220;peaceful&#8221; these Communists/Hippies/Anarchists really are at there so called &#8220;peaceful rallies.&#8221; I saw this video at <a href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/video-gold-leftist-mob-chases-charlie-rangel-from-wall-street-anarcho-commie-protest" target="_blank">Gateway Pundit</a> and had to chuckle at Chuckles Rangel being chased away by some violent left wing lily white goober.  Once the other left wing thugs noticed someone video taped this action by one of their peaceful protesters, they knew it would go viral on the Internet. So they then began chanting: We are sorry. This is a peaceful march. We Welcome everyone!&#8221; Well, everyone except capitalists that is. Where were all these &#8220;Occupy Wall Street&#8221; protests during the Bush years, and why are 99% of these hippies and Communists pure lily white? Obviously, they are racists.<br />
<span id="more-27319"></span><br />
<object width="520" height="360" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-yPDgMNu158?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="520" height="360" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-yPDgMNu158?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
<p>Maybe the drugged out progressive liberal thug simply didn&#8217;t realize who Charlie Rangel was. He&#8217;s really one of their leaders! Now all they need is Barney Frank to show up.</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/10/01/peaceful-left-wing-thugs-rush-charlie-rangel-who-was-supposed-to-speak-at-occupy-wall-street-protest/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/10/01/peaceful-left-wing-thugs-rush-charlie-rangel-who-was-supposed-to-speak-at-occupy-wall-street-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pitiful! House leaders to honor corrupt, tax cheating, censured Democrat Charlie Rangel</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/21/pitiful-house-leaders-to-honor-corrupt-tax-cheating-censured-democrat-charlie-rangel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/21/pitiful-house-leaders-to-honor-corrupt-tax-cheating-censured-democrat-charlie-rangel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=27075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tax cheating, corrupt Democrat Charlie Rangel once again proves that crime among politicians pays. According to The Hill, the House of Representatives will not only be wasting time and dignity, but also tax payer money and &#8220;honor&#8221; of all people Charlie Rangel. It&#8217;s been just NINE months since Congress censured the the corrupt, tax cheating, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" title="" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" rel=""><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="corrupt-charlie-rangel" /></a>Tax cheating, corrupt Democrat Charlie Rangel once again proves that crime among politicians pays. According to <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/183047-house-leaders-to-honor-rangel-nine-months-after-censure" target="_blank">The Hill</a>, the House of Representatives will not only be wasting time and dignity, but also tax payer money and &#8220;honor&#8221; of all people Charlie Rangel. It&#8217;s been just NINE months since Congress censured the the corrupt, tax cheating, <a href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/19/corrupt-tax-cheating-democrat-charles-rangel-stalks-rick-perry-in-new-york/">stalking</a> progressive liberal Democrat. Now, they will honor Rangel with his own official $64,000 portrait from his time as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. The same committee that Rangel had to quit because of his ethics issues. And it&#8217;s not just Democrats honoring this corrupt pile of filth. Weeper John Boehner will speak at a ceremony. Michigian RINO Dave Camp will also speak. What a fricken joke.</p>
<p><span id="more-27075"></span></p>
<p>Oh and a portrait isn&#8217;t really good enough for Rangel. He wanted a mural.</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/21/pitiful-house-leaders-to-honor-corrupt-tax-cheating-censured-democrat-charlie-rangel/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/21/pitiful-house-leaders-to-honor-corrupt-tax-cheating-censured-democrat-charlie-rangel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corrupt tax cheating Democrat Charles Rangel stalks Rick Perry in New York</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/19/corrupt-tax-cheating-democrat-charles-rangel-stalks-rick-perry-in-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/19/corrupt-tax-cheating-democrat-charles-rangel-stalks-rick-perry-in-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cheats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=27016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Republican Presidential candidate Rick Perry was meeting with Hispanic business leaders in New York today, and who happens to appear? Non other than corrupt, tax cheating Democrat Charlie Rangel. WTF is this corrupt congressional member doing stalking Presidential candidates? Trying to get him to invest in some condos in the Domicican Republic or something? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" title="" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" rel=""><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="corrupt-charlie-rangel" /></a>So Republican Presidential candidate Rick Perry was meeting with Hispanic business leaders in New York today, and who happens to appear? Non other than corrupt, tax cheating Democrat Charlie Rangel. WTF is this corrupt congressional member doing stalking Presidential candidates? Trying to get him to invest in some condos in the Domicican Republic or something? <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/19/rangel-makes-surprise-appearance-at-perrys-n-y-event/" target="_blank">CNN</a> of course sugar coats the story claiming Rangel was just doing the &#8220;neighborly thing&#8221; by welcoming Perry. Yea. uh huh.</p>
<p><span id="more-27016"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Rangel said he was simply doing the neighborly thing by welcoming the Republican presidential candidate to his locality. But a statement released by Rangel on Monday night did away with bipartisan pleasantries after the first sentence.</p>
<p>&#8220;As a courtesy, I stopped by Inwood to welcome Governor Rick Perry to the most beautiful congressional district in our nation,” Rangel said. “However, the Governor&#8217;s visit ironically came on the very same day that my constituents heard President Obama&#8217;s speech earlier today on getting America back to work. The President has made it clear that he would veto any bill that would change benefits for those who rely on Medicare but does not raise serious revenues by asking millionaires and billionaires or biggest corporations to pay their fair share.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Before this corrupt pile of sh*t worries about others paying their &#8220;fair share&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if he actually paid HIS OWN taxes? Gotta love corrupt Democrat/Progressive history. Who will stalk Perry next? Tim Geither?</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/19/corrupt-tax-cheating-democrat-charles-rangel-stalks-rick-perry-in-new-york/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/09/19/corrupt-tax-cheating-democrat-charles-rangel-stalks-rick-perry-in-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misogynist tax cheat corrupt Democrat Charlie Rangel loses it against Laura Ingraham</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/08/18/misogynist-tax-cheat-corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-loses-it-against-laura-ingraham/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/08/18/misogynist-tax-cheat-corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-loses-it-against-laura-ingraham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 02:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=26306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past week, Laura Ingraham has been guest hosting the O&#8217;Reilly Factor. I guess like Obama, the gasbag O&#8217;Reilly hasn&#8217;t had enough vacation time yet this year. With Ingraham hosting the show, it&#8217;s much better, and has much more relevant content. Tonight Ingraham interviewed corrupt tax cheating Democrat Charlie Rangel. Unlike O&#8217;Reilly who has gone soft since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" title="" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" rel=""><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="corrupt-charlie-rangel" /></a>For the past week, Laura Ingraham has been guest hosting the O&#8217;Reilly Factor. I guess like Obama, the gasbag O&#8217;Reilly hasn&#8217;t had enough vacation time yet this year. With Ingraham hosting the show, it&#8217;s much better, and has much more relevant content. Tonight Ingraham interviewed corrupt tax cheating Democrat Charlie Rangel. Unlike O&#8217;Reilly who has gone soft since the epic interview with Barney Frank years ago, Laura Ingraham took it to Rangel. She challenged him on what a failure Obama has been the African-American community. The topic was also Allen West&#8217;s &#8220;Democrat plantation&#8221; comments to Ingraham the day before. Rangel also <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/19/rangel-to-ingraham-oreilly-told-me-he-had-a-secret-weapon-didnt-say-it-was-just-a-pretty-girl" target="_blank">revealed his misogynist side</a> with this crack to Laura Ingraham.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Bill O’Reilly told me he had a secret weapon, I didn&#8217;t know it was just a pretty girl he would bring here.”</p></blockquote>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1117087141001&#038;w=520&#038;h=363"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript><br />
<span id="more-26306"></span></p>
<p>Nice. But typical for a progressive. I wonder if you reversed the situation. Some far left female was interviewing a conservative House member who made that crack. Think it would be all over the news, and there would be calls for his resignation? Video posted by <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/laura-ingraham/2011/08/18/guest-host-laura-ingraham-spars-rep-charles-rangel-no-spin-zone" target="_blank">Fox Nation</a></p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/08/18/misogynist-tax-cheat-corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-loses-it-against-laura-ingraham/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/08/18/misogynist-tax-cheat-corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-loses-it-against-laura-ingraham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax cheat Charles Rangel &#8211; What would Jesus or Moses or Allah do on the debt talks?</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/07/09/tax-cheat-charles-rangel-what-would-jesus-or-moses-or-allah-do-on-the-debt-talks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/07/09/tax-cheat-charles-rangel-what-would-jesus-or-moses-or-allah-do-on-the-debt-talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=25350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corrupt Democrat and tax cheat Charlie Rangel called on Obama to remember the &#8220;lesser of my brothers and sisters.&#8221; According to CNN who took this story and wrote a puff piece about Rangel, they also wondered what Jesus, Moses or Allah would do on the debt talks. I&#8217;m pretty sure neither Jesus, Moses or Allah [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" title="" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" rel=""><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="corrupt-charlie-rangel" /></a>Corrupt Democrat and tax cheat Charlie Rangel called on Obama to remember the &#8220;lesser of my brothers and sisters.&#8221; According to <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/08/rangel-what-would-jesus-do-on-the-debt-talks/" target="_blank">CNN</a> who took this story and wrote a puff piece about Rangel, they also wondered what Jesus, Moses or Allah would do on the debt talks. I&#8217;m pretty sure neither Jesus, Moses or Allah would have cheated on their taxes.</p>
<p><span id="more-25350"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What would Jesus do this weekend? Or Moses. Or Allah. Or anyone else,&#8221; the New York congressman said at a press conference on Capitol Hill. &#8220;I don&#8217;t want this book (debt negotiations) closed without the clergy having an opportunity to forcefully express themselves as well as I know they can do.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/07/09/tax-cheat-charles-rangel-what-would-jesus-or-moses-or-allah-do-on-the-debt-talks/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/07/09/tax-cheat-charles-rangel-what-would-jesus-or-moses-or-allah-do-on-the-debt-talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Rangel on why they didn&#8217;t pass a budget in 2010: &#8220;We didn&#8217;t get to it, it was a political hot potato&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/04/07/charlie-rangel-on-why-they-didnt-pass-a-budget-in-2010-we-didnt-get-to-it-it-was-a-political-hot-potato/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/04/07/charlie-rangel-on-why-they-didnt-pass-a-budget-in-2010-we-didnt-get-to-it-it-was-a-political-hot-potato/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 02:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=22792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such great leadership from Democrats. They really work for their tax payer funded salary don&#8217;t they?  In 2010 while Democrats were busy ramming bills like ObamaCARE and the Frank-N-Dodd bill down America&#8217;s throat, the question remains. Why didn&#8217;t the Democrat past a budget for fiscal year 2011 which started in October of last year? It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_corrupt-charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="corrupt-charlie-rangel" /></a>Such great leadership from Democrats. They really work for their tax payer funded salary don&#8217;t they?  In 2010 while Democrats were busy ramming bills like ObamaCARE and the Frank-N-Dodd bill down America&#8217;s throat, the question remains. Why didn&#8217;t the Democrat past a budget for fiscal year 2011 which started in October of last year? It was the first time since 1974 that congress didn&#8217;t pass a budget. The Marxist Democrats had plenty of time for socialist type bills like ObamaCARE, but according to Charlie Rangel, the Democrats just &#8220;didn&#8217;t get to it.&#8221; Also according to Rangel, the budget was too much of a &#8220;political hot potato&#8221; to deal with. I wonder what his excuse is for the lame duck session of congress when the elections were over?<br />
<span id="more-22792"></span></p>
<p><object width="520" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rNHk6Kh37PY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="520" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rNHk6Kh37PY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/04/07/charlie-rangel-on-why-they-didnt-pass-a-budget-in-2010-we-didnt-get-to-it-it-was-a-political-hot-potato/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/04/07/charlie-rangel-on-why-they-didnt-pass-a-budget-in-2010-we-didnt-get-to-it-it-was-a-political-hot-potato/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Rangel possibly in ethics trouble again for improperly using PAC funds for legal defense</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/05/charlie-rangel-in-ethics-trouble-again-for-possibly-improperly-using-pac-funds-for-legal-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/05/charlie-rangel-in-ethics-trouble-again-for-possibly-improperly-using-pac-funds-for-legal-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 03:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We know chuckles Charlie Rangel doesnt deal with the average American citizen. He admitted as much as a press conference after he got censured. But apparently he deals quite a bit in ethics violations as yet another ethics problem may be looming. According to the New York Post, The FEC is investigating whether or not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>We know chuckles Charlie Rangel <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/12/03/rangel-i-dont-deal-in-average-american-citizens/" target="_blank">doesnt deal with the average American citizen</a>. He admitted as much as a press conference after he got censured. But apparently he deals quite a bit in ethics violations as yet another ethics problem may be looming. According to the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/rangel_in_deeper_with_new_ethics_NN5qV3bXesmA99ZPPDytiO" target="_blank">New York Post</a>, The FEC is investigating whether or not Rangel improperly used his National Leadership PAC to fund his legal defense on ethics charges for which he was censured. Yea, you read right. He might be in trouble for how he handled his defense in his PREVIOUS ethics charges.</p>
<p><span id="more-19561"></span></p>
<p>Lawmakers such as Charlie Rangel are not allowed to use money in their individual campaign funds to pay for their own legal fees. Maybe chuckles just forget about this like he forgot to pay all those taxes for all those years. Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s swamp is still clogged 4 years later.</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/05/charlie-rangel-in-ethics-trouble-again-for-possibly-improperly-using-pac-funds-for-legal-defense/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/05/charlie-rangel-in-ethics-trouble-again-for-possibly-improperly-using-pac-funds-for-legal-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those who voted no on Rangel Censure include Alan Grayson, Anthony Weiner, and muslim Keith Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/idiots-who-voted-no-on-rangel-censure-include-alan-grayson-anthony-weiner-and-muslim-keith-ellison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/idiots-who-voted-no-on-rangel-censure-include-alan-grayson-anthony-weiner-and-muslim-keith-ellison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The list also includes Barney Frank, Jesse Jackson Jr, Maxine Waters, and Sheila Jackson-Lee. Those were the usual suspects. Sadly, there were also two Republicans. One of which I really respected a lot too, Peter King of New York. The other Republican was Donald Young of Alaska. He must have had a Murkowski moment or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>The list also includes Barney Frank, Jesse Jackson Jr, Maxine Waters, and Sheila Jackson-Lee. Those were the usual suspects. Sadly, there were also two Republicans. One of which I really respected a lot too, Peter King of New York. The other Republican was Donald Young of Alaska. He must have had a Murkowski moment or something. Here&#8217;s the complete list from <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll607.xml" target="_blank">House.gov</a>:</p>
<table border="4" width="90%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33.3%" valign="top">Ackerman<br />
Baca<br />
Becerra<br />
Bishop (GA)<br />
Brady (PA)<br />
Brown, Corrine<br />
Butterfield<br />
Carson (IN)<br />
Chu<br />
Clarke<br />
Clay<br />
Cleaver<br />
Clyburn<br />
Conyers<br />
Crowley<br />
Cummings<br />
Davis (IL)<br />
Edwards (MD)<br />
Ellison<br />
Engel<br />
Fattah<br />
Filner<br />
Frank (MA)<br />
Fudge<br />
Gonzalez<br />
Grayson<br />
Green, Al</td>
<td width="33.3%" valign="top">Grijalva<br />
Gutierrez<br />
Hinchey<br />
Hinojosa<br />
Hirono<br />
Honda<br />
Jackson (IL)<br />
Jackson Lee (TX)<br />
Johnson (GA)<br />
Johnson, E. B.<br />
Kanjorski<br />
Kennedy<br />
Kilpatrick (MI)<br />
<em>King (NY)</em><br />
Lee (CA)<br />
Levin<br />
Lewis (GA)<br />
Lowey<br />
Maloney<br />
McDermott<br />
Meeks (NY)<br />
Melancon<br />
Moore (KS)<br />
Moore (WI)<br />
Nadler (NY)<br />
Napolitano<br />
Ortiz</td>
<td width="33.3%" valign="top">Pastor (AZ)<br />
Payne<br />
Rangel<br />
Reyes<br />
Richardson<br />
Roybal-Allard<br />
Rush<br />
Salazar<br />
Scott (GA)<br />
Scott (VA)<br />
Serrano<br />
Slaughter<br />
Smith (WA)<br />
Stark<br />
Stupak<br />
Tanner<br />
Thompson (MS)<br />
Towns<br />
Velázquez<br />
Waters<br />
Watson<br />
Watt<br />
Weiner<br />
Woolsey<br />
<em>Young (AK)</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-19505"></span></p>
<p>See if you could notice a pattern with most of the no voters. *cough* Congressional Black Caucus *cough* There were a few surprise yes votes, at least a surprise to me. These included far left congresspeople: Dennis Kucinich, Chris Van Hollen, David Obey, Jan Schakowsky and George Miller.</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/idiots-who-voted-no-on-rangel-censure-include-alan-grayson-anthony-weiner-and-muslim-keith-ellison/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/idiots-who-voted-no-on-rangel-censure-include-alan-grayson-anthony-weiner-and-muslim-keith-ellison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Rangel Censured 333-79 &#8211; Rangel gives snotty speech, Democrats give him standing ovation</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/charlie-rangel-censured-333-79/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/charlie-rangel-censured-333-79/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel gets his public slap on the wrist and was censured by a vote of 333-79.Aka a public slap on the wrist. Before the censure vote, there was a vote on a Butterfield amendment reprimand Rangel instead of censure. This is basically a smaller slap on the wrist than censure. This vote got 146 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Charlie Rangel gets his public slap on the wrist and was censured by a vote of <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/12/02/undrained-swamp-things/" target="_blank">333-79</a>.Aka a public slap on the wrist. Before the censure vote, there was a vote on a Butterfield amendment  reprimand Rangel instead of censure. This is basically a smaller slap on the wrist than censure. This vote got 146 votes for, and 267 and failed. Three Republicans voted for the reprimand, two voted against censure. Look at how sad Botox Pelosi is reading the censure to Rangel:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="520" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HkhUuFn20cQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="520" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HkhUuFn20cQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<span id="more-19498"></span><br />
You thought that was it? Nope. Rangel followed the censure up with a snotty, arrogant speech, then got a standing ovation from Democrats. Absolutely pathetic!<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="520" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z2xxEnoxwpA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="520" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z2xxEnoxwpA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>POS Rangel should be in the slammer.</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/charlie-rangel-censured-333-79/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/12/02/charlie-rangel-censured-333-79/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corrupt Democrat Charlie Rangel  to beg House leaders to stop censure</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/28/corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-to-beg-house-leaders-to-stop-censure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/28/corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-to-beg-house-leaders-to-stop-censure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously Chuckles has no shame, but really do any politicians these days? According to Fox News/AP Charlie Rangel is going to beg the not to censure him and claims that a censure should be reserved for crooked politicians. Umm, newsflash to you Charlie, thats exactly what you are! Rangel will ask the House ethics committee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Obviously Chuckles has no shame, but really do any politicians these days? According to <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/28/rangel-ask-house-reject-censure-ruling" target="_blank">Fox News/AP</a> Charlie Rangel is going to beg the not to censure him and claims that a censure should be reserved for crooked politicians. Umm, newsflash to you Charlie, thats exactly what you are!</p>
<p><span id="more-19361"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Rangel will ask the House ethics committee chairman, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., for time to plead his case on the floor of the House, where he has served for 40 years, including a stint as chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee.</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/28/corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-to-beg-house-leaders-to-stop-censure/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/28/corrupt-democrat-charlie-rangel-to-beg-house-leaders-to-stop-censure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday Night Live mocks Rachel Maddow, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi and corruptocrat Charles Rangel</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/21/saturday-night-live-mocks-rachel-maddow-john-boehner-nancy-pelosi-and-corruptocrat-charles-rangel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/21/saturday-night-live-mocks-rachel-maddow-john-boehner-nancy-pelosi-and-corruptocrat-charles-rangel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opening clip of Saturday Night Live mocked not only Rachael Maddow, but Nancy Pelosi, Charlie Rangel, and of course John Boehner. In my opinion it was actually pretty funny, but aside from the look, it didn&#8217;t depict Maddow and her show accurately. Since hardly anyone watches it anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/logos/nbc.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/logos/thumbs/thumbs_nbc.jpg" alt="nbc" /></a>The opening clip of Saturday Night Live mocked not only Rachael Maddow, but Nancy Pelosi, Charlie Rangel, and of course John Boehner. In my opinion it was actually pretty funny, but aside from the look, it didn&#8217;t depict Maddow and her show accurately. Since hardly anyone watches it anyway.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="384" height="283" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="movie" value="http://widget.nbc.com/videos/nbcshort_at.swf?CXNID=1000004.10045NXC&#038;widID=4727a250e66f9723&#038;clipID=1261513&#038;showID=61&#038;siteurl=http://www.nbc.com?vty=fromWidget_Video&#038;dst=nbc|widget|NBC Video&#038;__source=nbc|widget|NBC Video"/><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://widget.nbc.com/videos/nbcshort_at.swf?CXNID=1000004.10045NXC&#038;widID=4727a250e66f9723&#038;clipID=1261513&#038;showID=61&#038;siteurl=http://www.nbc.com?vty=fromWidget_Video&#038;dst=nbc|widget|NBC Video&#038;__source=nbc|widget|NBC Video" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" width="384" height="283" align="middle" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/21/saturday-night-live-mocks-rachel-maddow-john-boehner-nancy-pelosi-and-corruptocrat-charles-rangel/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/21/saturday-night-live-mocks-rachel-maddow-john-boehner-nancy-pelosi-and-corruptocrat-charles-rangel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Figures. Charlie Rangel gets a slap on the wrist despote being convicted on 11 of 13 counts of ethics violations</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/18/figures-charlie-rangel-gets-a-slap-on-the-wrist-despote-being-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/18/figures-charlie-rangel-gets-a-slap-on-the-wrist-despote-being-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty much what I expected from the Democrats &#8220;punishment&#8221; of Charlie Rangel. Despite being convicted on 11 of the 13 charges of House Ethics violations, the House ethics committee is recommending a censure of Chuckles. According to The Wall Street Journal the ethics committee lawyer Blake Chisam told the panel on Thursday the senior Rangel&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Pretty much <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/11/18/wrist-slap-ethics-committee-counsel-recommends-censure-for-rangel/" target="_blank">what I expected</a> from the Democrats &#8220;punishment&#8221; of Charlie Rangel. Despite being convicted on <a href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/sloppy-charlie-rangel-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/" target="_blank">11 of the 13 charges</a> of House Ethics violations, the House ethics committee is <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/18/rangel-wrist-slap-hearing-convenes/" target="_blank">recommending a censure</a> of Chuckles. According to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704104104575622511610792080.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy" target="_blank">The Wall Street Journal</a> the ethics committee lawyer Blake Chisam told the panel on Thursday the senior Rangel&#8217;s conduct</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;demonstrated a lack of attention and carelessness over a broad range of issues over a lengthy period of time&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-19125"></span></p>
<p>Blake Chisam is the ethics-committee lawyer who is serving as prosecutor for Rangel&#8217;s disciplinary proceedings. Chisam is also the one who earlier in the week said Charlie Rangel was <a href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/progressive-liberal-democrat-blake-chisam-says-there-is-no-evidence-of-corruption-by-charlie-rangel/" target="_blank">just &#8220;sloppy&#8221; in his personal finances</a> and said there was no evidence of corruption by Rangel.</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/18/figures-charlie-rangel-gets-a-slap-on-the-wrist-despote-being-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/18/figures-charlie-rangel-gets-a-slap-on-the-wrist-despote-being-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corrupt Charlie Rangel whines about &#8220;unfair&#8221; ethics decision</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/corrupt-charlie-rangel-whines-about-unfair-ethics-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/corrupt-charlie-rangel-whines-about-unfair-ethics-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of crying by progressive liberal Marxist Democrats lately.  Charlie Rangel, who was convicted on 11 of 13 counts of ethics violations today is the latest Democrat to cry. According to Mr. Sloppy, the ethics hearings were &#8220;unfair.&#8221; What&#8217;s really unfair is that this dirtbag wouldn&#8217;t end up behind bars like any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>There&#8217;s been a lot of <a href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/democrat-losers-wipe-away-the-tears-on-house-floor/" target="_blank">crying by progressive liberal Marxist Democrats lately</a>.  Charlie Rangel, who was convicted on 11 of 13 counts of ethics violations today is the latest Democrat to cry. According to Mr. Sloppy, the ethics hearings were &#8220;unfair.&#8221; What&#8217;s really unfair is that this dirtbag wouldn&#8217;t end up behind bars like any normal citizen if they did what he did. According to <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/129439-rangel-slams-unfair-ethics-decision" target="_blank">The Hill</a>, Rangel again moaned about the ethics adjudicatory subcommittee&#8217;s &#8220;unprecedented&#8221; decision. He claimed that they violated his due process rights because they ruled without him having legal representation, and called it &#8220;unfair.&#8221; How long before the race card is brought out? I&#8217;m frankly surprised it hasn&#8217;t been thrown out there yet. Where is Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton when we need them?</p>
<p><span id="more-19053"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;How can anyone have confidence in the decision of the ethics subcommittee when I was deprived of due process rights, right to counsel and was not even in the room?&#8221; Rangel said. &#8220;I can only hope that the full committee will treat me more fairly, and take into account my entire 40 years of service to the Congress before making any decisions on sanction.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/corrupt-charlie-rangel-whines-about-unfair-ethics-decision/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/corrupt-charlie-rangel-whines-about-unfair-ethics-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sloppy Charlie Rangel convicted on 11 of 13 counts of ethics violations</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/sloppy-charlie-rangel-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/sloppy-charlie-rangel-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember, Charlie Rangel was just sloppy. That surely explains why the corrupt Democrat was found guilty of 11 of the 13 ethics violations leveled against him by a House Ethics Adjudicatory Subcommittee. While Rangel likely wouldn&#8217;t be booted out of Congress, this is just another shining example of the corruption of the progressive liberal Marxist [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Remember, <a href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/progressive-liberal-democrat-blake-chisam-says-there-is-no-evidence-of-corruption-by-charlie-rangel/" target="_blank">Charlie Rangel was just sloppy</a>. That surely explains why the corrupt Democrat was found <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/16/swamp-cleaning-rangel-found-guilty-of-11-out-of-13-charges/" target="_blank">guilty of 11 of the 13 ethics violations</a> leveled against h<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/11/16/breaking-rangel-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts/" target="_blank">im by a House Ethics Adjudicatory Subcommittee</a>. While Rangel likely wouldn&#8217;t be booted out of Congress, this is just another shining example of the corruption of the progressive liberal Marxist Democrat party. According to <a href="http://www.cspan.org/" target="_blank">C-SPAN</a>, this matter now moves to the full Ethics Committee. They will  hold a public sanctions hearing to determine the appropriate punishment for Rep. Rangel. &#8220;If&#8221; a violation is found, the Ethics Committee would vote on disciplinary measures and send a final report to the full House to take action. According to <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/129407-house-ethics-panel-convicts-rangel-on-multiple-counts" target="_blank">The Hill</a>, Rangel was was asked if he had any reaction to the panel&#8217;s decision, Rangel initially told reporters, &#8220;Nope, none,” adding that he first saw the ruling on television.<br />
<object width="520" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fj_MkiHocOY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fj_MkiHocOY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="520" height="385"></embed></object><br />
<span id="more-19038"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Later, in an official statement, Rangel slammed the ethics subcommittee&#8217;s &#8220;unprecedented&#8221; decision, saying his due process rights were violated because the panel ruled without him having legal representation.</p>
<p>&#8220;How can anyone have confidence in the decision of the ethics subcommittee when I was deprived of due process rights, right to counsel and was not even in the room?&#8221; Rangel said. &#8220;I can only hope that the full committee will treat me more fairly, and take into account my entire 40 years of service to the Congress before making any decisions on sanction.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/sloppy-charlie-rangel-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/16/sloppy-charlie-rangel-convicted-on-11-of-13-counts-of-ethics-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive liberal Blake Chisam says there is no evidence of corruption  by Charlie Rangel</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/progressive-liberal-democrat-blake-chisam-says-there-is-no-evidence-of-corruption-by-charlie-rangel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/progressive-liberal-democrat-blake-chisam-says-there-is-no-evidence-of-corruption-by-charlie-rangel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OIC. Everything is perfectly clear now on Chuckles Rangel&#8217;s corruption charges. He was simply &#8220;sloppy&#8221; in his personal finances says progressive liberal Blake Chisam. Who is this guy? Blake Chisam was once staffer for progressive liberal  Zoe Lundgren before he was named to be the top ethic committee lawyer. Surely if you or I were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>OIC. Everything is perfectly clear now on Chuckles Rangel&#8217;s corruption charges. He was simply &#8220;sloppy&#8221; in his personal finances says progressive liberal Blake Chisam. Who is this guy? Blake Chisam was once staffer <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1110/No_evidence_of_corruption_by_Rangel.html" target="_blank">for progressive liberal  Zoe Lundgren</a> before he was named to be the top ethic committee lawyer. Surely if you or I were as &#8220;sloppy&#8221; with our personal finances as Charlie Rangel, we wouldn&#8217;t end up in jail or anything like that, would we? I suppose this means that Bernie Madoff was just &#8220;sloppy&#8221; too?<br />
<object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=676223758001&#038;playerID=19407224001&#038;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAAETmrZQ~,EVFEM4AKJdQtJLv7zbMPiBGChHKnGYSG&#038;domain=embed&#038;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=676223758001&#038;playerID=19407224001&#038;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAAETmrZQ~,EVFEM4AKJdQtJLv7zbMPiBGChHKnGYSG&#038;domain=embed&#038;dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><br />
<span id="more-19023"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s hard to answer the question of personal financial benefit,&#8221; Chisam added. &#8221; I think the short answer is probably no. Do I believe that based on the record that Congressman Rangel took steps to benefit himself based on his position in Congress? No. I believe that the congressman, quite frankly, was overzealous in many of the things he did. And sloppy in his personal finances.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/progressive-liberal-democrat-blake-chisam-says-there-is-no-evidence-of-corruption-by-charlie-rangel/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/progressive-liberal-democrat-blake-chisam-says-there-is-no-evidence-of-corruption-by-charlie-rangel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corruptocrat Charlie Rangel walks out of ethics trial</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/corruptocrat-charlie-rangel-walks-out-of-ethics-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/corruptocrat-charlie-rangel-walks-out-of-ethics-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=19003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corrupt progressive liberal Democrats don&#8217;t like being on trial do they? Charlie Rangel is the latest example of a progressive to throw a temper tantrum then walk out of his trial. After Zoe Lofgren scolded Rangel for his suggestion that he had received no guidance on representation, Rangel picked his lardly self up and walked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Corrupt progressive liberal Democrats don&#8217;t like being on trial do they? <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/11/15/open-thread-rangel-ethics-hearing-starts-today/" target="_blank">Charlie Rangel is the latest example</a> of a progressive to <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/15/culture-of-corruption-rangel-on-trial/" target="_blank">throw a temper tantrum</a> then walk out of his trial. After Zoe Lofgren scolded Rangel for his suggestion that he had received no guidance on representation,  Rangel picked his lardly self up and walked out. *Sniff* I&#8217;m trying to choke back the tear for ole Chuckles.<br />
<span id="more-19003"></span><br />
<script src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4419484&amp;w=466&amp;h=263" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript></p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/corruptocrat-charlie-rangel-walks-out-of-ethics-trial/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/15/corruptocrat-charlie-rangel-walks-out-of-ethics-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More corruption from Charlie Rangel! Might have improperly used PAC money to pay for his defense</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/14/more-corruption-from-charlie-rangel-might-have-improperly-used-pac-money-to-pay-for-his-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/14/more-corruption-from-charlie-rangel-might-have-improperly-used-pac-money-to-pay-for-his-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=18984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chuckles Rangel might be in trouble again. The old, corrupt progressive liberal Marxist from Harlem just can&#8217;t help him. Literally. According to the New York Post, Charles Rangel, whose ethics trial starts tomorrow at 3pm EST on CSPAN, appears to have improperly used his National Leadership PAC  money to pay for his defense. Looks like Rangel tapped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Chuckles Rangel might be in trouble again. The old, corrupt progressive liberal Marxist from Harlem just can&#8217;t help him. Literally. According to the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/rangel_raided_pacs_for_ZlQ9s68r9cadmFBXvTeq1K#ixzz15GxiaZmF" target="_blank">New York Post</a>, Charles Rangel, whose ethics trial starts tomorrow at 3pm EST on CSPAN, appears to have improperly used his National Leadership PAC  money to pay for his defense. Looks like Rangel tapped took $293,000 to pay his main legal-defense team this year and then took  another $100,000 from the PAC in 2009 to pay lawyer Lanny Davis. I wonder. Is this the same Lanny David who regularly appears on Fox News?</p>
<p><span id="more-18984"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Two legal experts told The Post such spending is against House rules.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a breach of congressional ethics,&#8221; one campaign-finance lawyer said.</p>
<p>Washington, DC, political lawyer Cleta Mitchell said there is &#8220;no authority for a member to use leadership PAC funds as a slush fund to pay for personal or official expenses.&#8221;</p>
<p>Leadership PACs are typically used by politicians to donate money to other candidates.</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/14/more-corruption-from-charlie-rangel-might-have-improperly-used-pac-money-to-pay-for-his-defense/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/11/14/more-corruption-from-charlie-rangel-might-have-improperly-used-pac-money-to-pay-for-his-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you really surprised? Democrats set ethics trials for corrupt progressive liberal Democrats Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters after Election Day</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/10/07/are-you-really-surprised-democrats-set-ethics-trials-for-corrupt-progressive-liberal-democrats-charlie-rangel-and-maxine-waters-after-election-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/10/07/are-you-really-surprised-democrats-set-ethics-trials-for-corrupt-progressive-liberal-democrats-charlie-rangel-and-maxine-waters-after-election-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=17920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s pledge to &#8220;drain the swamp&#8221; when she became Speak of the House in 2007, the 111th Congress will go down as one of the most corrupt in U.S. history. The trials were supposed to take place during September for these two corrupt progressive liberal Democrats. Instead, as was expected by many (including [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Despite Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s pledge to &#8220;drain the swamp&#8221; when she became Speak of the House in 2007, the 111th Congress will go down as one of the most corrupt in U.S. history. The trials were supposed to take place during September for these two corrupt progressive liberal Democrats. Instead, as was expected by many (including myself), the trials for these corrupt piles of garbage <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/10/07/how-conveeeenient-post-elex-rangelswaters-trials-scheduled/" target="_blank">wouldn&#8217;t start until after the November 2nd elections</a>.  According to <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/10/charles-rangel-maxine-waters-/" target="_blank">USA Today</a>, Rangel&#8217;s trial will start on November 15th, and Waters will begin on November 29th. Both of these two scum are expected to win re-election easily as they are in s*ithole districts.</p>
<p><span id="more-17920"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The announcement by Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., who chairs the ethics panel, rejects a request by Republicans on the panel, who last week called for the public trials to be held before Nov. 2.</p>
<p>In her statement, Lofgren said the Republican request &#8212; rare for a committee that operates in secret and typically issues bipartisan statements &#8212; stood in contrast to &#8220;numerous&#8221; private negotiations between Republicans and Democrats to &#8220;reach consensus on how and when to proceed.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/10/07/are-you-really-surprised-democrats-set-ethics-trials-for-corrupt-progressive-liberal-democrats-charlie-rangel-and-maxine-waters-after-election-day/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/10/07/are-you-really-surprised-democrats-set-ethics-trials-for-corrupt-progressive-liberal-democrats-charlie-rangel-and-maxine-waters-after-election-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Figures. Corrupt Harlem Rep. Charlie Rangel wins Dem primary</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/14/figures-corrupt-harlem-rep-charlie-rangel-wins-dem-primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/14/figures-corrupt-harlem-rep-charlie-rangel-wins-dem-primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 04:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=17284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl Rove is probably tickled pink that another establishment candidate prevailed tonight, even though it was a Democrat. Charlie Rangel sailed to another Democrat nomination for Harlem Rep. beating his closest competitor Adam Clayton Powell IV easily. Corruptocrat Charlie Rangel has been a New York Reo. since 1970. Facing 13 ethics violations, Rangel had about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Karl Rove is probably tickled pink that another establishment candidate prevailed tonight, even though it was a Democrat. Charlie Rangel sailed to another Democrat nomination for Harlem Rep. beating his closest competitor Adam Clayton Powell IV easily. Corruptocrat Charlie Rangel has been a New York Reo. since 1970. Facing 13 ethics violations, Rangel had about 52 percent of the vote to 25 percent for Adam Clayton Powell IV with about 56% of the precincts reporting. This district as about as likely to vote for a Republican as Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s, so Rangel will end up with another term as Rep. Oh and remember when the ethics trials where supposed to start this month? Now they wouldn&#8217;t start until November, AFTER the election.</p>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/14/figures-corrupt-harlem-rep-charlie-rangel-wins-dem-primary/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/14/figures-corrupt-harlem-rep-charlie-rangel-wins-dem-primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times endorses Charlie Rangel&#8217;s opponent Joyce Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/04/new-york-times-endorses-charlie-rangels-opponent-joyce-johnson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/04/new-york-times-endorses-charlie-rangels-opponent-joyce-johnson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/?p=17008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poor chuckles. First Obama threw Charlie Rangel under the bus last month when news of a trial for his 13 ethics violations came out. Now, even the left wing New York Times has thrown ole Charlie under he bus. Bye endorsing Joyce Johnson over Charlie Rangel, the New York Times is backing a candidate who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/charlie-rangel.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/wp-content/gallery/congress/thumbs/thumbs_charlie-rangel.jpg" alt="charlie-rangel" /></a>Poor chuckles. First Obama threw Charlie Rangel under the bus last month when news of a trial for his 13 ethics violations came out. Now, even the left wing New York Times has thrown ole Charlie under he bus. Bye endorsing Joyce Johnson over Charlie Rangel, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/opinion/04sat1.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion" target="_blank">New York Times</a> is backing a candidate who few have ever heard of and is way back in poll for the upcoming Democrat primary. The primary is expected to go to either Rangel or Adam Clayton Powell IV. Powell&#8217;s father, Adam Clayton Powell III held Chuckles Rangel&#8217;s seat before losing it 40 years ago.</p>
<p><span id="more-17008"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The biggest name in the race is Assemblyman Adam Clayton Powell IV, whose father was a political superstar in that area. Mr. Powell, however, has done little in Albany, even by Albany’s do-little standards. He has shown no reason for voters to promote him.</p>
<p>There are four other choices: Vince Morgan, a community banker and former Rangel aide; Jonathan Tasini, a perennial liberal candidate; Ruben Vargas, another campaign regular; and Joyce Johnson, a former chief executive and educator. The best of these alternatives is Joyce Johnson, who, while struggling in the primary, has been a strong advocate for women’s rights and civil rights for many years.</p>
<p>In the 15th Congressional District Democratic primary, we endorse Joyce Johnson.</p></blockquote>
<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/04/new-york-times-endorses-charlie-rangels-opponent-joyce-johnson/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/09/04/new-york-times-endorses-charlie-rangels-opponent-joyce-johnson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/90 queries in 0.076 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 3037/3223 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.fireandreamitchell.com @ 2012-02-09 11:17:22 -->
